CLOSE

We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website https://www.hermes-investment.com, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept
CLOSE

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.

Proceed

The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Hon Hai Precision Industry

Labour policies and practices, board composition and transparency

Home / EOS Case Studies / Hon Hai Precision Industry

Hon Hai Precision is a Taiwan-based company involved in the manufacture and sale of computer, communication and consumer electronics products. The company has manufacturing sites in Asia, Europe, Mexico and South America but its largest production facilities are based in Mainland China. Established in 1974, Hon Hai is now one of the largest electronics manufacturing service providers in the world, with 1.3 million employees and clients such as Apple, HP, Nintendo and Sony. Hon Hai has a free float of about 75%, with its founder and combined chair/CEO owning about 13%.

Background
Hon Hai has been involved in several controversies relating primarily to the treatment of its employees in China with regard to working conditions and wages, which was the initial focus of our engagement. Over time, however, our engagement has progressed from the company’s approach to labour practices to human capital management more broadly, as the competitive business environment the company is in calls for a change in its business model.

What we did
While its early success has been linked to the popular brands of its customers, more recently the company started to offer its own products and services. The acquisition of Japanese Electronics firm Sharp showed a commitment towards innovation in its consumer products. At the same time, serious competitors in its core business have emerged. Against this background, we have encouraged the company to become more transparent in its objectives, strategy and business model. We had a series of engagement meetings with its senior executives to discuss these issues, visited its Shenzhen operations and developed a strong working relationship with the head of investor relations and the adviser to the chair/CEO. We also led a collaborative engagement, which included delivery of a statement at the company’s 2014 AGM on behalf of a group of investors owning more than 300 million shares, around 2.3%, of the company. We produced our own statement at the 2015 AGM, again using the opportunity to put our concerns and suggestions directly to the chair/CEO. In September 2015, the adviser to the chair/CEO joined us via teleconferencing at our Client Advisory Council for a live engagement meeting with a small group of responsible long-term asset owners. His presentation about human capital management, corporate governance, developments and plans for the future demonstrated the company’s progress and willingness to address more openly the concerns we have raised. The adviser credited our feedback with contributing to the improvements Hon Hai has made.

In the fourth quarter of 2016, we visited a new key manufacturing site of the company and examined the residential quarters of its employees, as well as training and recreational facilities. We discussed how its at-risk processes are now subject to additional physical and procedural safeguards. We also addressed employee benefits systems and grievance mechanisms with the vice chair of the labour union. We were able to speak to a group of assembly line workers on their maternity leave about their perception of the company, without any staff present, whose feedback was positive.

Results
The company has made good progress on employee relations issues as verified by an independent assessment of the Fair Labor Association in 2012. Following our intensive – robust but friendly – engagement, the company has also progressed on transparency and communications. It has enhanced its disclosure, launched its vision and strategy website in March 2015 and published an improved sustainability report in 2015, incorporating the suggestions we have made during our engagement. An audit committee composed of three new independent directors was set up in 2016.

In early 2017, a third-party research firm took the company off its controversial companies list.

However, with regard to board composition, effectiveness and succession, we have so far only been given limited assurance. We have also started discussing the company’s disclosure of climate change and environmental performance and continue to push for better access to independent directors.

Share this post:
Christine Chow Dr Christine Chow is responsible for the financial services, technology and extractive sectors in Asia ex-Japan. She has 19 years of experience in portfolio management, research and investment consulting. Christine's PhD thesis on shareholder engagement for responsible investment was short-listed for a UN award in Sweden for industry relevance and academic excellence. She is an adjunct associate professor in the Department of Finance at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. She is a governor of the London School of Economics and a member of the university’s investment committee. She was also a member of the greater China committee of the Hong Kong Retirement Funds Association between 2014-2016. Christine has worked at a number of multinational corporations such as Merrill Lynch, Schroders and Hewitt. In the 1990s, she was responsible for establishing strategic partnerships in fund management for the Schroders Group, especially in Mainland China. Christine is a graduate of the London School of Economics and the University of Melbourne. She also completed an executive education course on financial engineering at Stanford University.
Read all articles by Christine Chow
Previous article:
Uni-President Enterprises
Next article:
China Mobile

Engagement objectives

Environmental: Improve environmental performance disclosure

Social & ethical: Employee labour policies and practices/ Human capital management

Governance: Board composition and effectiveness/ Succession preparation

Strategy, risk & communication: Transparency and communication

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Bill Mackenzie
  • Bruce Duguid
  • Christine Chow
  • Colin Melvin
  • Darren Brady
  • Dominic Burke
  • Emma Hunt
  • Hans-Christoph Hirt
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Jaime Gornsztejn
  • Justine Lutterodt
  • Leon Kamhi
  • Louise Dudley
  • Lui Goldie
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Maxine Wille
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Michael Viehs
  • Natacha Dimitrijevic
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Philip Nell
  • Rochelle Giugni
  • Roland Bosch
  • Sachi Suzuki
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Goodman
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • environment
  • eos
  • governance
  • social
  • strategy