We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Carbon risk should be at the heart of investment strategy

Home / Press Centre / Carbon risk should be at the heart of investment strategy

01 December 2015

Hermes Investment Management, the £29.5 billion manager focused on delivering superior, sustainable, risk adjusted returns to its clients – responsibly, has today published a report, Turning Down the Heat which focuses on the risks carbon poses to investment portfolios and outlines the four pillars of Hermes’ strategy to mitigate this risk.

Saker Nusseibeh, Chief Executive, Hermes Investment Management, said: “It is crucial that we create the right outcomes from our investment decisions – and the right outcomes on a 30-year time horizon are those that mitigate risk, including carbon risk. In just 20 years, if circumstances don’t change, we will already be approaching dangerous levels of warming. Reducing risk ensures better returns for our beneficiaries by minimizing potential expenditure incurred by negative factors later on. We also have a better chance of leaving to our children and our grandchildren a world they can live in.”

1. Awareness of carbon risk exposure in investment portfolios
The first step is to identify the risks, which is much easier than it used to be because the quality and quantity of data available has increased dramatically in recent years. As you do not manage what you don’t measure, the starting point has to be to assess your exposure to carbon intensive sectors and GHG emissions.

2. Integrating carbon risk in investment decisions.
When we developed our carbon risk approach we realised that our portfolio managers already consider carbon risk through their wider awareness of risks and opportunities. Often, this approach is more implicit than explicit with managers citing factors related to carbon risk, such as tightening regulation, consumer expectations and political risk, as some of the reasons to avoid certain carbon-intensive sectors or companies in particular regions.

3. Managing and engaging to reduce carbon risk
We prefer to manage carbon risk by using the power of direct management and engagement. In equities, environmental regulations indirectly affect the value of investments in many industries in ways that are hard to anticipate. In real estate, regulation affects investors more directly because they own and directly manage the assets. Moreover, occupiers are looking to occupy buildings with good energy efficiency credentials as part of their own sustainability policies. Finally we have seen growing interest from asset owners and a clear desire to see we are managing the risks around climate change.

For these reasons, we integrate carbon and wider ESG-related risks across our real estate investments. The benefits of doing so include the added value that more sustainable properties deliver because these are the properties that tenants want. We set, systematically monitor and report on carbon targets and performance in a programme of active management that has delivered continuous emission reductions and delivered value for occupiers. Since 2006 we have overseen an average reduction in GHG emissions of 60% across a portfolio of 18 properties through a combination of refurbishment, active management and engaging with occupiers.

When talking to companies, the first step is to establish what you want to achieve through your engagement. It is about maximising the value of each individual investment in order to provide the best circumstances for long-term returns.

4. Advocating to promote market transformation
Nusseibeh continued: “We believe in advocacy and sharing best practice with fellow investors or other key stakeholders. As such, over the years, we have been actively engaged in sector organisations such as the PRI and UNEP-FI promoting a better understanding of responsible investment and how to integrate ESG into investment management.”

Our engagement has focused on helping to shape capital markets for the benefit of all stakeholders. To enable us to better manage carbon, water and pollution risk we engage with public policymakers to encourage transparent disclosure of resource use and carbon emissions, best practice approaches and methodologies as well as carbon-pricing mechanisms.

If the asset management industry is to integrate factors that cover a time period of 20-30 years into the investment decision-making processes, collaboration with peers, policy makers and sector organisations is critical. Where new challenges arise, we believe in advocacy and sharing best practice with fellow investors or other key stakeholders.

Nusseibeh concluded: “There is an odd but prevalent view that the investment community sits somehow outside of what it invests in. But we are indigenous to the system. We do not merely observe from afar. Our actions, our beliefs and our investment decisions shape the system. There is still a long way for us to go in recognising that the economic system is not separate from society.

“Carbon risk cannot and should not be ignored. It is time that we in the investment industry help to address it.”

Share this post:

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Amy Wilson
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Ingrid Holmes
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Kimberley Lewis
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Maxime Le Floch, CFA
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • environment
  • eos

Press contacts