CLOSE

We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website https://www.hermes-investment.com, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept
CLOSE

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.

Proceed

The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Tightening by doing nothing...

Home / Press Centre / Tightening by doing nothing…

Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist
04 May 2017
Macro Economics

In his May issue of Ahead of the Curve, Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist at Hermes Investment Management, discusses his view that while markets are still taking a ‘glass-half-full view’ of the world, protectionism is the new risk emerging. This he argues, suggests we face a year of two halves – where stimulus-euphoria gradually gives way to stagflation concern. Helpfully, though, the trade-off is that central bank policy rates stay lower than many expect.

Amid this, the US Federal Reserve remains the test case for whether central banks can ever ‘normalise’ policy interest rates. We expect it to try, but fail – peaking out at a far lower policy rate (1¼-1½%) than in past US recoveries.

Adjusting for QE, nominal US & UK policy rates could be as low as -4¼% & -3%...

We update our ‘Policy Looseness Analysis’ to gauge how the US and UK’s overall – monetary and fiscal – policy positions should shift into 2018. By taking explicit account of QE, true US & UK policy rates may be as low as -4¼% & -3% respectively. This is far lower, of course, than their maximum official rates (unadjusted for QE) of 1% and 0.25%.

Running true rates this low would make the FOMC increasingly uncomfortable if at the same time the QE stock remains as bloated as it is (see chart below). Some FOMC members believe that persistent excess capacity warrants a much lower ‘neutral’ (or ‘Goldilocks’) policy rate than in previous recoveries.

Therefore, to do some of the ‘heavy lifting’ and help achieve a low peak rate, the Fed could in tandem push on the other monetary lever: quantitative tightening (QT). Admittedly, after eight years of running QE, the challenge will be to ultimately sell back some of the assets without higher long yields triggering a sharp rise in US mortgage rates.

However, with the Fed and BoE believing it’s the QE stock, rather than flow, that matters most, a less visible tightening signal than raising rates aggressively might be to allow the stock to erode naturally, by no longer reinvesting the proceeds of their maturing bonds. To avoid sharply higher yields, of course, even this may require ‘forward guidance’.

The easiest way to normalise monetary policy is surely to tighten by doing nothing…

Selling the assets back is admittedly one for later, and would need to be done gradually to minimise the disruption to bond markets. Nevertheless, as a precursor, terminating the reinvestmCHARTent programme would surely be the gentlest way of tightening – in effect by ‘doing nothing’.

It would help keep peak rates low, and give comfort that central banks are not falling ‘behind the curve’. It may even go some way to reducing the downside of QE – evidenced by asset-price distortions, suppressed saving, and funding strains on many pension schemes.

 

Share this post:
Neil Williams Group Chief Economist Neil joined Hermes in August 2009 and is responsible for Hermes’ economic research. He has a forward-looking approach to generate investment strategy ideas. Neil adopts top-down methods – macro and market analysis to identify interest rate and credit value, and sovereign default risk. Neil began his career in 1987 at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), becoming its youngest ever Head of Economic Policy. He went on to hold a number of senior positions in investment banks - including Director of Bond Research at UBS, Head of Research at Sumitomo International, Global Head of Emerging Markets Research at PaineWebber International, and, before coming to Hermes, Head of Sovereign Research and Strategy at Mizuho International. Neil has 30 years’ industry experience and earned an MA in Economics in 1986 from Manchester University, having the previous year completed his BSc (Hons), also in Economics, from University College Swansea.
Read all articles by Neil Williams

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Parry
  • Eoin Murray
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • macro economics

Press contacts