CLOSE

We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website https://www.hermes-investment.com, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2016, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept
CLOSE

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

Proceed

The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Hermes recommends voting against the discharge of the management and supervisory boards at the Volkswagen AGM on 22 June

Home / EOS Press / Hermes recommends voting against the discharge of the management and supervisory boards at the Volkswagen AGM on 22 June

Dr. Hans-Christoph Hirt, Co-Head of Hermes EOS
In the light of the emissions scandal, which broke in September 2015, and the lack of information until today who bears responsibility for it, Hermes EOS will recommend its clients to vote against the discharge of both the management and the supervisory board at Volkswagen’s annual general meeting on 22 June 2016. In addition, we have initiated a request for a special audit to investigate their acts and potential breaches of duty.

In contrast to the litigation that has been brought against Volkswagen to date by a number of shareholders, the proposed special audit will focus on underlying corporate governance issues, not least the influence of the principal shareholders, the composition and effectiveness of the supervisory board and the corporate culture, as well as potential liability of the members of the management and supervisory boards.

Our initiative for a special audit follows a decade of Hermes EOS’ engagement with Volkswagen.

Main concerns about the alleged acts and potential omissions of Volkswagen’s management and supervisory boards in relation to the emissions scandal:

1. Management board’s failure to ensure compliance with laws and regulations and to implement an effective monitoring system: We believe the management board has failed to ensure compliance with laws and regulations, as required under section 76 I German Stock Corporation Act, and failed to put in place an effective monitoring system that meets the requirements of section 91 II of the German Stock Corporation Act. Moreover, in our view, there are significant concerns about the escalation processes.

2. Supervisory board composition: We believe that Volkswagen’s supervisory board lacks a sufficient level of independent members. In our view, this may have contributed to the apparent deficiencies in its monitoring of the management board. We also believe that the company’s declaration regarding the German Corporate Governance Code is wrong with regard to the supervisory board’s level of independence.

3. Supervisory board’s monitoring of management board: We believe there have been deficiencies in the supervisory board’s monitoring of the management board in breach of section 111 I German Stock Corporation Act.

4. Management board remuneration: We believe the remuneration Volkswagen paid to management board members for the financial year 2015 breaches the statutory framework set out in section 87 of the German Stock Corporation Act.

5. Capital market communication: We believe Volkswagen was late in informing the market about the emissions scandal, thus breaching section 15 of the German Securities Trading Act.

For full details of our counterproposal and the request for a special audit, please refer to the website of Volkswagen AG.

Background: Vote on discharge and special audit in the German Stock Corporation Act

In Germany, shareholders have the opportunity to vote on the so-called discharge of the management and supervisory boards for the last financial year at annual meetings. This is generally regarded as approval of the actions of boards but has no legal implications. By voting against the discharge, shareholders can formally express concerns and a lack of confidence in the boards.

Furthermore, by presenting a counterproposal on the discharge, encouraging other shareholders to oppose the discharge, a shareholder can also request a special audit to investigate the acts and potential breaches of duty by the supervisory and management boards in the last financial year.

Press contacts