CLOSE

We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website https://www.hermes-investment.com, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept
CLOSE

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.

Proceed

The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Beggar thy neighbour...

Home / Press Centre / Beggar thy neighbour…

In his latest quarterly Economic Outlook, Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist at Hermes Investment Management, believes that markets are taking more than a ‘glass half full’ view of the macro outlook, with little consideration of the new risk emerging. In the short term, this makes sense, he says, as speculation, rightly, that major economies will open the fiscal box is sparking ‘reflation trades’.

Could be a year of two halves...
Yet, while better for growth, markets are ignoring the darker cloud looming. Rather than financial distrust, we may need to brace for political distrust, with the threat of beggar-thy-neighbour policies - from the US to anti-European populism - rising.

In which case, markets face a year of two halves, where stimulus-euphoria gradually gives way to stagflation concern. Helpfully, the trade-off though, is that policy rates stay lower than many expect.

Without care, an unhelpful jigsaw piece from the 1930s - retaliatory trade protectionism - might come crashing into place. In 1930, it was triggered by the Smoot-Hawley reforms that raised US tariffs to up to 20% on over 20,000 imported goods. This impacted the US’s relatively smaller number of trading partners (predominantly Canada, Europe), and prolonged the depression.

Impact of protectionism could be more complicated than in the 1930s...
Congress this time may push back on a general approach. Yet, Mr Trump could still invoke ‘Super 301’ to impose tariffs without its or WTO approval, on countries deemed (by him) to be engaging in “unfair” trade practices against the US.

The impact of protectionism this time could be far more complicated than in the 1930s. First, the economic and financial linkages suggest the knock-on would be more far reaching. Global retaliation would activate second-round effects that later offset the initial growth-impulse from Mr Trump’s tax cuts.

Second, the deflationary return to the US could thus be much larger than anticipated. China’s commitment to US Treasuries would be questioned, supply chains for US corporates disrupted, and the US’s already shrinking labour supply and potential growth reduced further.

Third, should protectionism build, inflation will reappear. But, with the possible exception of the US facing labour shortages, it’ll be the ‘wrong sort’ – cost, rather than demand-led. Central banks will ‘turn a blind’ eye as economies stagflate, so the inflation flame may snuff itself out.

Too soon for the ‘great rotation’...
And, this comes on top of monetary expansion. Central banks still daren’t lift the tide of liquidity hiding the sharp rocks beneath. Real rates will stay negative, with peak rates lower than we’re used to, and central banks unable to turn off their taps without unintended consequences.

In which case, ‘lower for longer’ will continue. And, chasing the ‘great rotation’ of an en masse shift out of government bonds means taking on the central banks. So, for investors, the quest for yield - even in 2018, ten years after the pit of the crisis - will persist.

Share this post:

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Parry
  • Eoin Murray
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nina Röehrbein
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • macro economics

Press contacts