We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Responsible Capitalism Survey:

60% of investors believe rise of passives will diminish shareholder influence over companies

Home / Press Centre / Responsible Capitalism Survey: 60% of investors believe rise of passives will diminish shareholder influence over companies

26 October 2015

Hermes Investment Management, the £29.8 billion manager focused on delivering superior, sustainable, risk adjusted returns to its clients – responsibly, has today published the fourth and final paper of its annual Responsible Capitalism survey.

The paper, which focused on Stewardship, found 60% of the 109 UK and European institutional investors surveyed expect the advent of passive investment vehicles to have a negative impact on the vital issue of shareholder engagement.

Author of the paper, Hermes Investment Management’s Head of Responsibility, Leon Kamhi, said:

“Sixty percent of the investors we surveyed believe the growth of low-cost passive management will cause large shareholders to become distanced from many of the companies they invest in.

“However, if anything, passive investors should engage more, not less. Engagement is the only tool passive investors have to improve the value of the companies they invest in.”

Investors have a fiduciary duty to speak up

Meanwhile, 21% of respondents still believe that challenging companies on ESG issues is not important, a number Kamhi found troubling.

“While 71% of respondents believe that institutional shareholders have an ethical and fiduciary responsibility to challenge companies in relation to poor ESG practices, it is worrying that many still do not see it as an issue. Whenever there are poor ESG practices that lead to the destruction of value, investors have a fiduciary duty to speak up,” Kamhi explained.

Asset managers and owners need to engage

Kamhi believes if investors are to be responsible owners they need to engage – and not just with company management, but also with public policy makers as well. If investors can influence policies at a national or sector level, Kamhi feels it could result in risk reduction and a lowering of the cost of capital.

“If we can achieve something at a public policy level, it has a ripple effect on the whole industry. Pension funds are universal investors invested in thousands of companies across all sectors of the economy, so they are less interested in how, say, AstraZeneca is doing compared with GlaxoSmithKline, and more concerned with the health of the entire pharmaceutical sector,” Kamhi said. He added, “This is particularly relevant for passive investors who are exposed to an entire index and not only the best performers.”

It is also no surprise that there is increasing academic evidence that good stewardship adds value to companies, Kamhi explains. For example, research from Hermes Global Equities found that well-governed companies tended to outperform poorly governed companies by an average of over 30 basis points per month over a five year period[1], while a study by the Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment at Oxford University and Arabesque Partners shows that there is “remarkable correlation between diligent sustainability business practices and economic performance”.

Despite this, the survey showed that just 46% of investors believe companies focusing on ESG issues produce better long-term returns for investors.

Effective stewardship vital to responsible capitalism

Kamhi believes stewardship, ultimately, means working to ensure that everyone in the investment chain is aligned and addresses the interests of pension fund beneficiaries. As such, it is vitally important to responsible capitalism.“Investors have a significant opportunity to effectively collaborate, increase their investment in responsible ownership activities and thereby better align companies and public policy makers to the creation of long term wealth for beneficiaries to enjoy in a sustainable economy,” he concludes.

Read the paper: Responsible Capitalism and Stewardship

[1] ESG Investing: Does it make you feel good, or is it actually good for your portfolio? January 2014

Share this post:

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Amy Wilson
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Ingrid Holmes
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Kimberley Lewis
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Maxime Le Floch, CFA
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • eos
  • governance

Press contacts