CLOSE

We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website https://www.hermes-investment.com, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept
CLOSE

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.

Proceed

The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Six beliefs driving our macro outlook for 2017...

Home / Press Centre / Six beliefs driving our macro outlook for 2017…

Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist
07 December 2016
Macro Economics

In his latest quarterly Economic Outlook, Looking into 2017, Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist at Hermes Investment Management, sets out the six core beliefs that lie behind his macro view of 2017.

After a year of political surprises, we could see tectonic shifts in economic policy. Speculation, rightly, that major economies will open their fiscal box is currently causing ‘reflation trades’ to puff up growth assets, raise inflation expectations, and make the 30-year bull-run in government bonds look even staler.

Reflation, inflation, & political contagion, but too soon for the ‘great rotation’...

Yet, while this should be better for growth, financial markets may be ignoring the new global risk emerging. Rather than the financial distrust of 2008-09, we may need to brace for political distrust, with the threat of beggar-thy-neighbour policies - from the US to Europe - rising.

Amid these conflicting growth forces, our macro outlook is based on six core beliefs.

First, governments in 2017 will offer fiscal solutions to add stimulus, try to appease electorates, and take the policy ‘baton’ back from central banks. President-elect Donald Trump is set to reflate the US, and austerity in the UK is being deferred again. It makes sense too for slower-growth Japan and the euro-zone to loosen fiscally using the aggressive QE they’re doing anyway to cap any rise in bond yields.

Second, this will come on top of – not instead of - further monetary expansion. We are nine years since the first traces of crisis, yet central banks still daren’t lift the tide of liquidity hiding the sharp rocks beneath. Real policy rates will stay negative, with peak rates lower than before, and central banks unable to turn off their liquidity taps without unintended consequences.

President Trump could invoke ‘Super 301’ to unilaterally impose trade tariffs...

Third, once protectionist forces build, inflation will reappear. But, it will be the ‘wrong sort’ – cost push, led by tariffs, goods and labour shortages, rather than demand-pull. In which case, central banks will ‘turn a blind’ eye as their economies stagflate - meaning the inflationary flame may snuff itself out without policy action.

Fourth, China has the tools to soften its landing. Its main macro dilemma is supporting growth, yet minimising a boost to the housing market. There, affordability in the main cities has deteriorated faster than in other world financial centres. The deflationary and leveraging risks need watching. The PBoC may yet have to delve into its massive $3.1tn reserves to cushion the indirect blow of a ‘trade war’ on China’s balance sheets.

But, fifth, for those non commodity-exporting emerging markets with high exposure to short-term US dollar debt and/or foreign saving needs, the outlook’s less rosy. For these countries, clear vulnerabilities exist. But, for others, external debt-ratios are lower, with fewer currency pegs to have to protect. And, where domestic debt climbs, they too can run QE.

Already halfway down the Japan route, the euro-zone can open the fiscal box...

Finally, without convincing recoveries, any contagion, unlike 2008, may be political rather than financial. Passage of Italy’s Constitutional referendum result sets up the euro-zone for a highly charged political year.

With elections coming in France, Germany, The Netherlands, and maybe now Italy and Spain, there may be little sympathy for a quick, ‘no-strings’ UK Brexit deal once Article 50 is triggered. Our exit negotiations could thus take much longer than the three years needed in 1982-1985 by Greenland.

In which case, while reflation trades look appropriate in the short term, political disruption, protectionism, cost inflation, and dissipating growth suggest ‘lower for longer’ and the grab for yield will persist.

And, with the liquidity taps still on, chasing the ‘great rotation’ of an en masse shift out of bonds means taking on the central banks. Because, for more fiscally-active governments, to initiate also the end of QE would be like a ‘turkey voting for Christmas’.

Share this post:
Neil Williams Group Chief Economist Neil joined Hermes in August 2009 and is responsible for Hermes’ economic research. He has a forward-looking approach to generate investment strategy ideas. Neil adopts top-down methods – macro and market analysis to identify interest rate and credit value, and sovereign default risk. Neil began his career in 1987 at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), becoming its youngest ever Head of Economic Policy. He went on to hold a number of senior positions in investment banks - including Director of Bond Research at UBS, Head of Research at Sumitomo International, Global Head of Emerging Markets Research at PaineWebber International, and, before coming to Hermes, Head of Sovereign Research and Strategy at Mizuho International. Neil has 30 years’ industry experience and earned an MA in Economics in 1986 from Manchester University, having the previous year completed his BSc (Hons), also in Economics, from University College Swansea.
Read all articles by Neil Williams

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Parry
  • Eoin Murray
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • macro economics

Press contacts