Search this website. You can use fund codes to locate specific funds

This voting season saw a notable increase in shareholder resolutions seeking a vote on climate transition plans, and proposals for racial equity audits.

This year we saw a number of companies offering shareholders a vote on their climate transition plans, including some in the oil and gas, construction, aviation, and consumer goods sectors. This came in response to various moves to improve investor scrutiny of such plans, following the rapid expansion in the number of companies aiming to achieve net-zero emissions.

EOS at Federated Hermes is generally supportive of the concept of a vote on transition plans, believing it will improve a company’s focus on climate change and aid transparency. It should also improve investor scrutiny and engagement, and provide a clear pathway to engagement escalation in the event of material opposition from shareholders. We sought to support proposals that demonstrated robust target-setting, were aligned to external frameworks and accreditations such as the Science-Based Targets initiative, and where we could see a clear and credible strategy in place to achieve the stated targets, including at Unilever, Aviva and Nestlé.

This year we also saw a significant number of racial equity audit shareholder proposals, including at US banks Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase. Resolutions requesting enhanced disclosure on the effectiveness of diversity and inclusion programmes were also filed at American Express, Berkshire Hathaway, Johnson & Johnson and others. Although we did not always agree with every aspect of the supporting statements, we broadly agreed with their substance, believing that racial equity audits would add substantial value beyond the actions the companies were already taking.

During engagement we explained that audits can provide additional insight into the root causes of complex problems that companies must address in order to develop enduring solutions. They also enable more rigorous performance evaluation against underlying challenges and increase a board’s capacity to provide effective oversight.

This article appears in our Q2 2021 Public Engagement Report.

Related Insights

Cryptocurrency – the good, the bad and the ugly
Investors should engage with companies to understand the risks associated with cryptocurrencies.
China’s long and winding road to net zero
We are engaging with Chinese and Hong Kong companies on establishing targets and plans for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in line with the Paris Agreement.
Japan Tobacco case study
Japan Tobacco has demonstrated its commitment to eliminating child labour from its supply chain through various programmes and significantly improving its reporting on the issue, including a standalone human rights report.
POSCO case study
Following engagement on climate change, POSCO strengthened its governance and management framework of climate-related issues.
Associated British Foods case study
ABF has evaluated its approach to risk management and subsequently provided increased assurance to investors and increased its communication on the topic.
JD.com case study
JD.com published its first ESG report in April 2021 and its second sustainability report in June 2021. It also held its first shareholder meeting in June 2021 with appointment of its first female board director.

EOS Client Service and Business Development

Amy D’Eugenio,
Head of Client Service and Business Development, EOS