Search this website. You can use fund codes to locate specific funds

Green bonds alone won’t get us to Paris: we need firm-level action

A new paper by the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) argues that if we are to accelerate the decarbonisation of the economy, the focus needs to move from behaviour at the green-project level to that of individual companies.

The BIS  paper, ‘Green bonds and carbon emissions: exploring the case for a rating system at the firm level’ assesses the impact of fighting the climate crisis through green-bond-funded corporate projects, concluding that “green bond projects have not necessarily translated into comparatively low or falling carbon emissions at the firm level.”1

The authors suggest that a firm-level, green-rating system based on carbon-emission intensity would incentivise companies to align their decarbonisation with the goals of the Paris Agreement.

Decarbonising the economy is security agnostic

We unequivocally agree that climate assessments at the security level are not a good way to assess the decarbonisation pathways of individual firms. And while green-bond-financed projects are necessary in solving the climate crisis, they are not sufficient.

The growth of the green-bond market (see figure 1) is clearly a positive development, yet decarbonisation will not happen unless companies find ways to create economic value and simultaneously align their activities with the goals of the Paris Agreement. As such, we believe the BIS authors are correct to shift the focus away from projects and towards cumulative corporate actions to tackle the climate crisis.

Figure 1. Sustainability-themed credit issuance

Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance, as at October 2020.

Scoring carbon intensity: a possible input, but not a panacea

The firm-level, green-rating system separates the distribution of companies into deciles based on carbon intensity. But if this is employed, it should form only one aspect of the investment process and not be relied on as a self-contained measure.

Because the score is based on historical data, it needs to be placed in the context of a more complete ex-ante assessment. For example, a company that is currently managing climate-related physical and transition risks through mergers and acquisitions, capital expenditure or technology could still score poorly using this metric. Yet if we see value in a firm’s debt securities, it is these companies – the ones making demonstrable changes – that we wish to invest in and engage with.

And while a standardised scoring system would bring benefits, calculating emissions intensity for comparative purposes is more easily done than in the past. Environmental disclosures have improved rapidly, while the number of data providers has also grown. In addition, the Carbon Disclosure Project scores – which scores companies on environmental performance – provides insights that are comparable to that of the proposed scores.   

A shift in focus

We are encouraged by the principal message of the BIS paper and agree that there is a need to incentivise firms to decarbonise their economic activities if we are to achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement.

At the international business of Federated Hermes, we take a holistic view of corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) behaviours and use stewardship to inform our view of how companies are bringing about positive change. As such, we firmly support the idea that the focus should shift from green-financed projects to broader change at the firm level.   

Risk profile
  • Nothing in this document constitutes a solicitation or offer to any person to buy or sell any related securities or financial instruments.

  • Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results and targets are not guaranteed.

More Insights

The Meeting Room Webcast: Global Emerging Markets, May 2021
As we navigate the ever-changing landscape of the coronavirus, the Global Emerging Markets team reflect on recent performance, and discuss the outlook for Global Emerging Markets from both a market and portfolio positioning perspective.
Global Emerging Markets positive impact case study: Richter Gedeon Nyrt
Richter's contribution to Target 3.8 of the UN SDGs is particularly meaningful.
The future of the office: An ESG issue too
Flexible working can enhance employee satisfaction, productivity and the long-term value of companies.
Car makers under scrutiny in EOS’s Q1 Public Engagement Report
Why car makers need to accelerate their transition to electric vehicles
Five key themes in energy credit
Here we present our reflections on investing in energy credit so far this year.
Doomsday at the bank: a spoonful of measures helps the resolution go down
The global financial crisis proved bank failure was not just ancient history or fictional fodder.