CLOSE

We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website https://www.hermes-investment.com, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2016, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept
CLOSE

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

Proceed

The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Hermes EOS: Siemens is taking steps in the right direction

Home / EOS Press / Hermes EOS: Siemens is taking steps in the right direction

25 January 2016
Uncategorised

Ahead of Siemens’s AGM in Munich on 26 January 2016, Dr Hans-Christoph Hirt, Director, explains why Hermes EOS will support the early re-election of three members of the supervisory board and its significance for the succession of the chair.

“Hermes EOS, on behalf of the institutional investors it represents, will welcome the progress Siemens has made in the implementation of its strategy, Vision 2020, the 2015 financial results and vote for the early re-election of three members of the supervisory board at the company’s AGM in Munich. We will also request more tangible evidence that the company’s programme to create an ownership culture has a practical impact.”

Early re-election of three members of the supervisory board
“At the 2014 AGM, we raised strong concerns about the composition and work of the supervisory board, following intensive private engagement with Siemens at all levels, including the chair. We questioned the ability of the supervisory board to challenge and support the management board on key strategic issues.

“The company has reacted decisively to criticism at the AGM in 2014. It carried out an externally facilitated board evaluation, revamped a key committee and proposed to replace two supervisory board members at the 2015 AGM – three years prior to the expiry of their mandates. The replacement of two supervisory board members at the 2015 AGM, following the previous change to its composition in late 2013, is remarkable, given that all 10 shareholder representatives were elected for five-year terms in January 2013, and in our view evidences the company’s commitment to cultural change.

“In light of the refreshment we have seen and the forthcoming chair succession, we welcome the early re-election of three members of the supervisory board, whose mandates currently end in 2018, until 2021. We regard this early re-election as another step in the succession planning process and in ensuring stability and continuity in the supervisory board during the implementation of Vision 2020. We however encourage Siemens to communicate more openly about the process for preparation of succession at the top of the supervisory board, due in 2018.”

Progress in the implementation of strategy Vision 2020 and 2015 financial results
“We are satisfied with the company’s progress in the implementation of the first phase of its strategy Vision 2020 and believe that the 2015 financial results show material movement towards its implementation. We would like Siemens to focus on further progress in all businesses towards achieving margins in line with leading peers, or at least within the target ranges, and ultimately profitable growth.”

Progress towards achieving an ownership culture
“Hermes EOS welcomes Vision 2020’s focus on fostering an ownership culture and commends the company for its employee share programme and the profit sharing pool. In order to obtain more visibility on the company’s progress on culture, we will request more tangible evidence that the company’s ownership culture programme has an impact on employees and their behaviours.”

Share this post:

Find posts by author

Find posts by category

  • Select category
  • uncategorised

Press contacts