We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie notices.

Corporate hybrid market a likely winner in today’s yield-starved crowd out

Home / Press Centre / Corporate hybrid market a likely winner in today’s yield-starved crowd out

Fraser Lundie, CFA, Co-Head of Credit and Senior Credit Portfolio Manager
07 September 2016

This summer’s decision by the Bank of England to buy corporate bonds, following the path of the ECB’s CSPP, perpetuates the low-growth, near-zero interest rate environment of today. Investors now face being crowded out of “eligible assets”, and top of the list of places to go for spill-over opportunities is in the corporate hybrid market, writes Fraser Lundie, Co-Head of Credit at Hermes Investment Management.

The European Central Bank’s (ECB’s) corporate sector purchase programme (CSPP), which began in June, now joined by the Bank of England, will be a key technical driver for the market through the remainder of 2016.  Since the CSPP launch, senior spreads have outperformed hybrids (figure 1). In our view, if hybrids remain at above-historical pick-up from seniors, this will constrain supply, while the higher ‘structure premium’ makes them attractive for investors.

credit img

For issuers, hybrids offer some attractive features, such as enabling them to protect the credit rating or improve the credit ratios for covenant purposes. For investors, hybrids can provide a rewarding risk-adjusted return.  This apparent win-win for issuers and investors alike has seen to the rapid expansion of the hybrid market.  Indeed, since 2013 European companies have issued more than €30bn in hybrids each year, and the value of corporate hybrids outstanding now outweighs the entire European convertible bonds market.

So a large market, offering significant yield pick-up in a yield starved market – what’s the risk? The three most important structural risks of hybrids are extension, coupon deferral and special-event calls.

Extension risk refers to the potential non-call of the security – that is, the issuer decides not to pay back investors on the expected call date. Secondly, the ability of a company to defer coupon payments at their discretion creates another risk for investors. If coupons on hybrids are deferred, the company has no ability to pay dividends. The important caveat here is that in most structures the coupons are cumulative and compounding, meaning that if the firm decides to start paying dividends again it will have to pay all deferred coupons along with any interest accrued. As a result it is very expensive to defer coupons, and companies would be reluctant to do so unless they are in real distress. Thirdly, the risks posed by any special-event calls. These are particular instances where the issuer has the option to call the hybrid bonds at a price that is normally very close to par. Common call clauses include changes in the ratings methodologies used by rating agencies, regulatory accounting treatments, a change of control in the ownership of a company, and tax treatments.

If one can become comfortable with these risks, the return profile of hybrids can be attractive, but how can you decipher it?  Essentially it can be divided into four components. The first two cover rates and ‘senior spread’, which represent the compensation for the credit risk at the senior level. Further down the structure, we also consider the ‘subordination premium’. This provides compensation for a lower recovery in case of default.  Finally, the ‘structure premium’ reflects the key risks of hybrids discussed above, and is by far the largest component of total return for a hybrid instrument.

Still, the idiosyncratic risks require due care.  An example we like and hold is Solvay, a Belgian specialty chemical company. It has exposure to the growing specialty chemical segment, as well as positive secular trends in the automotive, aerospace, smart devices and healthcare industries globally. Further, it emphasises stabilising leverage post aggregate acquisition history, while the structural risks of Solvay’s hybrids are mitigated by the importance of dividends for chemical companies, and our expectation that hybrids will remain a permanent part of the company’s capital structure.

Given the favourable credit trajectory of the credit, we think that as the company delivers on its plan over the next few years, the hybrid part of the capital structure will outperform senior – part of a broader theme we think is worth recognising at this juncture.

Share this post:
Fraser Lundie, CFA Co-Head of Credit and Senior Credit Portfolio Manager Fraser joined Hermes in February 2010 and is Co-Head of Credit and lead manager on the Hermes range of credit strategies. Prior to this he was at Fortis Investments, where he was responsible for European high yield credit. Fraser graduated from the University of Aberdeen with an MA (Hons) in Economics; he earned an MSc in Investment Analysis from the University of Stirling and is a CFA charterholder. In 2017, Fraser joined the board of CFA UK, a member society of the CFA Institute. Having previously featured in Financial News’s ‘40 Under 40 Rising Stars of Asset Management’, an editorial selection of the brightest up-and-coming men and women in the industry, in 2015 Fraser was named as one of the top 10 star fund managers of tomorrow by the Daily Telegraph. In 2016, Citywire Americas named Fraser number one in their global high yield manager review, and InvestmentEurope and Investment Week both named the Hermes Multi Strategy Credit Fund top global bond fund at their respective 2017 Fund Manager of the Year Awards. CFA® is a trademark owned by the CFA Institute.
Read all articles by Fraser Lundie, CFA

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • credit

Press contacts