CLOSE

We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website https://www.hermes-investment.com, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2016, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept
CLOSE

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

Proceed

The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Living with the ‘new normal’

Home / Press centre / Living with the ‘new normal’

Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist
06 October 2016
Ahead of the CurveEconomics

In his latest Ahead of the Curve publication, Group Chief Economist Neil Williams, examines the effects of the unconventional monetary policy of the Federal Reserve and Bank of England, and whether central banks can ever ‘normalise’ rates.

Eight years on from the collapse of Lehman Brothers, and macro comparisons with 2008 can thankfully be diluted by the fact that US and UK real GDP are significantly up on their pre-crisis peaks, bank supervision looks tighter, and central banks, after a slow start, now have a proven track record of policy coordination.

Yet, policy rates in 2017 will stay close to the floor, while, separately, political risk in the developed economies - largely absent in 2008 - is building.

The US Fed remains the test case for whether central banks can ever ‘normalise’ rates. We expect it to try but fail - hiking the funds target just twice more, probably this December then in March or June 2017. But, with cold winds elsewhere, particularly in Brexit-tainted Europe, we expect it to peak at just 1% - way lower than its historic average of about 5%. We may thus face another two years of negative real rates, in the US and UK.

Adjusting for QE, true US & UK policy rates may be as low -4.5% & -2.5%
With this mind, we update our ‘Policy Looseness Analysis’ to gauge the extent to which G5 countries’ overall - monetary and fiscal - policy positions should shift in 2017. By taking explicit account of QE and fiscal positions, our analysis beefs up the ‘Taylor Rule’ the US Fed uses for setting policy rates.

The Taylor Rule (without QE and fiscal considerations) currently pitches the Fed’s target rate as high as 4.5%. This is 400bp above the Fed’s current 0.25-0.5% range, suggesting the Fed is underestimating just how accommodative the true rate is.

Charts 1 and 2 below summarise our results. For the US, we quantify the impact of QE on rates by adjusting real rates for former Fed chairman Bernanke’s assertion that the $600bn part of QE2 back in 2011 was equivalent to slicing an extra 75bp off the Fed funds target, which was at that stage just 0.25%. Extending this logic to the combined $4.5trn QE since 2009 infers about 550bp in total rate easing.

If we’re right about coming rate hikes, this suggests a de facto (QE-adjusted) nominal Fed funds rate of about -4.5% - much lower than the 0.5% ‘official’ rate. This equates to an even lower, -6% real rate when we factor in the Fed’s preferred core inflation target (core PCE).

Likewise for the UK, we have adjusted the policy rate for the BoE’s 2009 estimate that £200bn in QE was akin to taking around 150bp off the Bank rate. Extrapolating this, the cumulative QE since 2009 thus implies a UK policy rate of about -2.5% - much lower than the 0.25% official Bank rate. This suggests a real QE-adjusted rate (using CPI) as low as -3.25%.

In the long term, the Fed and BoE looking to peak out at lower than ‘normal’ rates can pull on the other monetary lever: ‘QT’ (quantitative tightening). This may go some way to removing the unintended consequences of QE currently evidenced by asset-price distortions, suppressed saving, and increased funding strains on many pension schemes. Otherwise, QE may be remembered more for these problems than the solution it offered in 2009 for unclogging the financial ‘plumbing’.

In the meantime, however, without convincing growth and employment recoveries, any contagion may, unlike 2008-09, be political rather than financial. Hopefully, governments in 2017 will help avert this by offering fiscal solutions - taking the policy ‘baton’ back from the central banks.

Chart 1

Chart 2

Share this post:
Neil Williams Group Chief Economist Neil joined Hermes in August 2009 and is responsible for Hermes’ economic research. He has a forward-looking approach to generate investment strategy ideas. Neil adopts top-down methods – macro and market analysis to identify interest rate and credit value, and sovereign default risk. Neil began his career in 1987 at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), becoming its youngest ever Head of Economic Policy. He went on to hold a number of senior positions in investment banks - including Director of Bond Research at UBS, Head of Research at Sumitomo International, Global Head of Emerging Markets Research at PaineWebber International, and, before coming to Hermes, Head of Sovereign Research and Strategy at Mizuho International. Neil has 29 years’ industry experience and earned an MA in Economics in 1986 from Manchester University, having the previous year completed his BSc (Hons), also in Economics, from University College Swansea.
Read all articles by Neil Williams

Press contacts