We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie notices.

From horse power to zero carbon

Transitions in energy

Home / EOS Blog / From horse power to zero carbon – Transitions in energy

Energy transition before 1914
The mews houses in picturesque London streets that now command astronomic prices once were the stables for the horses owned by the residents of nearby mansions. However, the arrival of the internal combustion engine at the start of the 20th century led to the collapse of London’s horse population within a decade.

The world’s oldest oil companies have their foundations in this energy transition from horse to engine power in the past century.

Is a century of success leading to a blind spot?
In a recent meeting with one of the largest US oil and gas majors, we made the point that it was rightly proud of the conservatism with which it runs its business: its balance sheet, capital discipline and commitment to minimising operational and project risk. But we highlighted that this conservatism could actually be its blind spot in relation to the energy transition that the global economy is facing in the next two or three decades if the world is to avoid the worst effects of climate change.

We reminded the company that the industry had done a great job after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 in reviewing, improving and above all rehearsing for possible catastrophic accidents. By doing this work, we believe that the industry as a whole has worked well to improve its risk management and operational standards. The industry accepts that this type of scenario planning is a vital part of the risk management it needs to conduct.

Climate change risk scenario planning
Scenario planning around climate change is even more important to the companies and investors in them. While no one can predict precisely how the energy transition will unfold, it is true to say that the industry needs to prepare for spectacular changes affecting it and demand for its products. Asset owners are increasingly concerned about a collapse in the value of their investments in the oil and gas industry, as the energy transition to low and zero greenhouse gas emissions gains pace and the sector potentially faces an existential threat.

While the industry is right to point out that natural gas will have a role to play in the energy mix for possibly a prolonged period, it needs to accept that the zero carbon equivalent to the change from horsepower will profoundly disrupt the business models of energy companies.

Institutional investor response to shareholder proposals on climate change
Shareholder proposals, such as those filed at Shell and BP in 2015 and this year at Exxon Mobil and Chevron, are seeking reassurance from companies that climate change scenario planning work is taking place in as much earnest as the remedial work that the industry conducted in the aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon disaster.

The energy transition may put the fossil fuel investments of institutional investors and those of their clients at risk. So what will their response to the shareholder proposals be? If they do not plan to support these resolutions, what would their rationale be? What is it in these modest proposals seeking disclosure on various possible scenarios that may take place in the energy landscape that is not helpful to them as they navigate this momentous change to the global economy? How do they otherwise obtain reassurance that the companies are beginning to plan for this momentous change? What do they think about fossil fuel exposure in their portfolios?

Those who do not vote in favour of the resolutions at US companies must publicly explain why they are not doing so, especially if they have supported more rigorous resolutions at the UK oil and gas majors. Many institutional and retail clients will want to know the answer to these questions.

Share this post:
Tim Goodman Tim Goodman is a director at Hermes EOS and sector lead for oil and gas. He is also responsible for Hermes EOS’ activities in North America. Previously, he worked in the insurance industry and held a number of senior operational management roles before acting as a company secretary at a UK-listed company. He is a member of the Institute of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators, having obtained the institute prize for the best overall performance when he qualified. Tim is a regular speaker on governance-related matters, a former member of the US Council of Institutional Investors’ corporate governance advisory council and a former chair of the UK Quoted Companies Alliance corporate governance committee. He is currently on the ESG advisory board of US law firm Grant & Eisenhofer.
Read all articles by Tim Goodman

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Bill Mackenzie
  • Bruce Duguid
  • Christine Chow
  • Claire Gavini
  • Colin Melvin
  • Darren Brady
  • Dominic Burke
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Emma Hunt
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Hans-Christoph Hirt
  • Harriet Steel
  • Jaime Gornsztejn
  • Justine Lutterodt
  • Leon Kamhi
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Maxine Wille
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Michael Viehs
  • Natacha Dimitrijevic
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Philip Nell
  • Rochelle Giugni
  • Roland Bosch
  • Sachi Suzuki
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Goodman
  • Tommaso Mancuso

Find posts by category

  • environment
  • eos
  • stewardship