We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

The two fallacies of gas Part II


Home / EOS Blog / The two fallacies of gas Part II – Bridging

Natural gas is often referred to as a bridge to the low-carbon economy. By this it is meant that gas is a mechanism through which tailpipe emissions may be reduced, while maintaining a similar pathway of socioeconomic progress that is dependent on the use of fossil fuels. A convenient prospect for fossil fuel companies and a narrative which is surely attractive to preserve. Nonetheless, embedded within the term bridge is the eventuality of net zero emissions, in which the viability of the use of gas is minimal. This is the second fallacy, adding to that of the concerns about methane leakage rates which I described in my earlier blog.

Granted, there are a number of benefits to the use of gas in the short term. Research demonstrates that the proliferation of fracking and the production and use of natural gas in the US has resulted in the country reaching emission reduction targets seven years early. As well as having those climate benefits, gas can play other pivotal roles within the energy system. It can act as a solution for the natural intermittency of renewable energy, particularly on an interseasonal basis. In addition, for many of the industries that are difficult to decarbonise, such as cement and steel, the high temperatures created by fossil fuel combustion can be difficult to recreate with the existing low-carbon technologies.

However, the length of this bridge may not be as long as people expect and as fossil fuel companies promote. It is important to keep in mind during this conversation the bias of fossil fuel companies. They specialise in liquid hydrocarbon extraction and production, for the most part operating in remote and adverse environments. Thus, natural gas is symbiotic to their business model, while renewables are not. Therefore, we can assume that their predictions for the role that natural gas might play in the energy system might be somewhat inflated.

The two most important developments that unsettle these forecasts is progress in technology and regulation. On the technology front, experience curves for solar and wind are rapidly lowering the levelised cost of electricity and outcompeting coal and gas in auctions. Even when coupled with batteries, they compete on a cost basis. Other technologies such as hydrolysis of water or liquid air storage are emerging as possible solutions for managing the supply of renewable energy over longer time periods. The deployment of technologies such as the electric arc furnace are other possible decarbonisation strategies that circumvent the use of fossil fuels.

The – almost – global consensus of the 2015 Paris Agreement to mitigate global warming to below 2°C has caused a magnification of climate policies. Research from the Grantham Research Institute for Climate Change and the Environment indicates that 106 new climate change-related laws and policies have been implemented since the agreement. To reach the Nationally Determined Contributions of the agreement, many countries will have to rapidly decarbonise. In the UK, there seems little scope for the use of gas within the existing carbon reduction targets that go beyond 2030, in the absence of carbon capture and storage (CCS). Carbon taxes and other financial mechanisms have a significant role to play, and again, depending on the price employed, make natural gas an unattractive investment.

The misconceptions of natural gas weigh in the favour of fossil fuel companies. The diversion of attention to this energy source allows them to focus on their operations while proclaiming the environmental merits of these actions. However, this allows them to ignore the existential question of their long-term role in the economy. But, those, like myself, with less optimism about the prospects of CCS, ought to question the feasibility of this decarbonisation strategy.

Share this post:
Nick Spooner Nick Spooner is an engagement associate supporting the operations of Hermes EOS primarily in the US. He has a particular focus on climate change and the engagement with those sectors that are most affected by it, including energy, agriculture, financial and automotive. Nick joined the team following the completion of his MSc in Climate Change, Management and Finance at Imperial College London. During his Master’s degree he also carried out an internship within the Hermes EOS team, where he produced a report analysing the implications of the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures recommendations for the financial sector. Previously, he worked as a sustainability consultant in the real estate sector.
Read all articles by Nick Spooner

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Bill Mackenzie
  • Bruce Duguid
  • Christine Chow
  • Claire Gavini
  • Colin Melvin
  • Darren Brady
  • Dominic Burke
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Emma Hunt
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Hans-Christoph Hirt
  • Harriet Steel
  • Jaime Gornsztejn
  • Justine Lutterodt
  • Leon Kamhi
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Maxine Wille
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Michael Viehs
  • Natacha Dimitrijevic
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Philip Nell
  • Rochelle Giugni
  • Roland Bosch
  • Sachi Suzuki
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Goodman
  • Tommaso Mancuso

Find posts by category

  • environment
  • eos