We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie notices.

Small companies, big opportunities in the US

10 March 2017
US Equities

President Trump’s pro-growth agenda, centred on fiscal stimulus, repatriation and de-regulation, should accelerate the US economy in the coming years. Nevertheless, his more measured recent speech to Congress was perhaps the first acknowledgement that the implementation of these policies will likely take time and require Republican endorsement.

Mindful of this, it’s important to focus on pre-existing economic fundamentals as much as fiscal promises when looking to invest in the US. Domestically-focussed small and mid-cap companies are well positioned to continue to benefit from a healthy and improving US economy alongside any fiscal policies that may take time to come through.

A fundamentally strong economy

In recent months, discussion regarding US markets has focused on the support that President Trump’s economic policies could offer. On the campaign trail, Trump suggested that he would lower corporate taxes and increase fiscal investment in infrastructure to support US businesses and economic growth. The prospect of these policies prompted a rapid rise in markets on the President’s election.

However, the market’s focus on Trump’s policies has somewhat overlooked the existing economic strength in the US. The economy has been improving for over five years. Unemployment has declined rapidly since 2010, to a historic low of 4.7%, while consumer confidence has followed a steady upward trajectory since 2012 and is accelerating as wages rise. Meanwhile, small business sentiment spiked last year on the expectation of Trump’s promise of deregulation and has been gradually improving since 2012.

While Trump has acted as a lightning rod for investors’ improved economic sentiment and could fuel growth in the US economy, there is justification for economic optimism even without the full spectrum of policies he has proposed.

The advantages of smaller businesses

With the US economy expected to continue its upward trajectory, it is domestically exposed businesses that should be the largest beneficiaries. Here, small- and mid-cap investors have a clear advantage. US SMID stocks typically earn 70-80% of their revenue domestically compared with 50% for large caps, so should benefit considerably from any enhanced US economic growth.

A significant proportion of US SMID companies pay the full 35% corporate tax rate so should see earnings rise disproportionately from any reduction in corporate taxation versus their larger counterparts, many of whom already enjoy favourable tax rates. Further, the repatriation of cash should encourage increased M&A activity, with SMID companies the likely targets.

Small and mid-cap companies have historically outperformed the broader market in periods of rising rates, in particular the early stages, which tend to coincide with strong GDP growth and a benign economic backdrop, a context we are currently operating in.

Hermes US SMID: accessing the opportunity

While the US SMID market is attractive, careful stock selection remains key. At Hermes we look for quality companies with high barriers to entry, a durable competitive advantage and that can be bought at a discount to intrinsic value. Importantly, for us, this focus on quality does not mean our portfolio consists solely of defensive stocks: we are willing to buy cyclical stocks if they meet our quality criteria.

With this in mind, we have recently increased our positions in two sectors we believe will flourish given the improved economic backdrop. The banking sector should benefit from rising rates and improving consumer sentiment. Meanwhile, industrial stocks should benefit from an increase in capital investment, infrastructure stimulus and, more broadly, inflation.

Our focus on quality and selectivity means we maintain a relatively concentrated portfolio. Our investors are exposed to what we believe are the very best opportunities in the market. Our emphasis on the durability of a company’s competitive advantage results in longer holding periods of, typically, 3-5 years, an approach that has allowed us to outperform through the market cycle. The Strategy has outperformed the Russell 2500 over 1, 3, 5 years and since launch (1) and over the same periods it has sat first quartile against its peer group. (2)

  1. Source: Hermes at 31 December 2016. Performance shown net adjusted for 75bps of fees in US dollars. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.
  2. Evestment as at 30 September 2016.
Share this post:

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Parry
  • Andrey Kuznetsov, CFA
  • Audra Stundziaite
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Elena Tedesco
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Gary Greenberg
  • Geir Lode
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Hamish Galpin
  • Harriet Steel
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Mitch Reznick, CFA
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Patrick Marshall
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tim Goodman
  • Tommaso Mancuso

Find posts by category

  • us equities