CLOSE

We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website https://www.hermes-investment.com, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2016, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept
CLOSE

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

Proceed

The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Credit talk flows from Colorado Springs

Home / Spectrum / Credit talk flows from Colorado Springs

Mitch Reznick, Co-Head of Credit and Head of Credit Research
15 June 2016
Fixed Income

I’ve just returned from Colorado Springs, where I attended the annual Barclays High Yield Bond and Syndicated Loan Conference. The question that has dominated global credit markets in the past 18 months inevitably took centre stage: where to for the price of a barrel of oil?

However, besides the energy sector, investors were also interested in how the countervailing forces of the European Central Bank’s corporate bond buying programme, the CSPP, and the potential for Brexit were impacting global credit markets.

Evergreen topics like managing credit in an illiquid market and determining where we are in the cycle also featured. As a London-based global credit investor attending a conference in the US, it was no surprise that the first thing people wanted to discuss was the UK potentially leaving the EU. Besides expressions of incredulity about the logic of doing so, US investors cited the 23 June referendum as a reason for containing their sterling or euro risks, or both.

Brexit discussions were often followed by anything related to the CSPP because it is clearly having a real impact on global credit markets. This exogenous force has driven European spreads past fair value, making the region less attractive as a global relative value play than, say, the US and emerging markets.

As a result, flows into Europe from the US have slowed and, as we have previously discussed, flows from European to US credit markets have increased, just as they did from Japan after the nation’s central bank implemented its negative-rate policy.

Since 2011, the poor trading liquidity in global credit markets has been a constant theme. Beyond these general observations, our discussions with peers and presentations by Barclays have confirmed our long-held belief that, on a more granular level, the credit market’s liquidity has bifurcated. Large issues from public companies, including credit-default swaps – which allow banks and investors to better manage risk – still trade relatively well and in most cases on a ‘principal’ basis, whereas small issues trade very thinly (if at all) and almost exclusively on an ‘agency’ or bespoke basis. And while there has always been a gap between liquid and less-liquid instruments, it’s now like there is an ocean between the two.

This distaste for smaller companies’ debt securities has led to a slowdown in smaller, illiquid primary-market issuance. Because the market signals are not entirely clear, another hot topic at the conference was pinpointing where we are in the credit cycle. To that end, some cited rising financial leverage, tightening credit standards and an increase in defaults as signs that the credit cycle was turning more malevolent.

While it is not hard to argue that this is the case, others – including Barclays credit strategists – point to the spike in default rates as being in near-isolation among commodity-related companies, and note the stability of economic leading indicators and the US employment rate as showing signs that the cycle has still got some life to it.

As for Hermes Credit, our conclusion from the conference was to continue ignoring the siren song to invest in securities from ‘one-bond-only’ companies just because they look cheap.  In addition, there seems to be a widespread aversion to European credit in the US due to valuations and event risk at the moment, which speaks to our preference for US credit. That said, the negative sentiment brought by the Brexit referendum has created relative-value opportunities in UK credit and some corporate capital securities in euros.

Taking a broader view of the market, debate about the status of the credit cycle reinforces the importance of issuer and security selection in the current environment.

Share this post:
Mitch Reznick Co-Head of Credit and Head of Credit Research Mitch joined Hermes in February 2010 as head of research on the Hermes Credit team. Prior to this he was co-head of credit research for the global credit and hybrids team at Fortis Investments. Other roles at Fortis included portfolio manager of European high yield funds, based in London, and senior credit analyst, based in Paris. Before this he worked as an associate analyst in the leveraged finance group at Moody’s Investors Service in New York. Mitch earned a Master’s degree in International Affairs at Columbia University in New York City and a Bachelor’s degree in History at Pitzer College, one of the Claremont Colleges in California. He is a CFA charterholder.
Read all articles by Mitch Reznick

Find posts by author

  • Andrey Kuznetsov
  • Audra Stundziaite
  • Filippo Alloatti
  • Fraser Lundie
  • Jonathan Lee
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Mitch Reznick

Find posts by category

  • Select category
  • credit