We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Uni-President Enterprises

Food safety management

Home / EOS Case Studies / Uni-President Enterprises

Uni-President Enterprises (Uni-President), together with its subsidiaries in Mainland China and Southeast Asia, manufactures, processes and markets instant noodles, dairy products, frozen foods, soft drinks, soy sauces, meat products, animal feeds, aquatic feeds, edible oils, bread, cakes and desserts. The company also operates vending machines and food distribution centres.

Our engagement with the company was triggered by the 2011 food contamination scandal involving plasticiser, which led to a large-scale recall of affected products and significant damage to Uni-President’s reputation. Our engagement focus was to ensure that the company adopts the necessary structures, systems and processes to minimise the risk of further incidents.

What we did
Following dialogue with the company and a site visit to its headquarters in June 2014, we saw significant improvements in its food safety management. After our visit, the company set up a new structure to connect all the sustainability initiatives in its various departments, incorporating the recommendations we had made regarding the disclosure of its efforts. Unfortunately, a further major incident involving tainted oil in the company’s supply chain was discovered in November 2014. Despite our disappointment about this, we were supportive of the cultural change that management wanted to implement across the company. We recommended more granular reporting on its food safety management, including the use of infographics to better demonstrate the processes in place.

With regard to governance, we were concerned about the lack of transparency regarding the director nominations process and the insufficient number of independent directors on the company’s board. We therefore strongly pushed for a strengthening of the board through the nomination of independent directors and better disclosure thereof.

In February 2017, we paid a visit to the company’s new food safety centre. In accordance with international best practices of hygiene and safety, the testing facilities were kept separate from each other. The number of specialist and segregated laboratories focus on food sample testing for veterinary drugs, pesticides, pollutants, adulterants, additives, lipids, heavy metals and antimicrobial substances. We also discussed the company’s efforts in food waste and water management.

The company reacted to the concerns we raised. At its AGM in June 2013, it put forward three independent directors for election by shareholders and set up an independent audit committee. While the extent and timeliness of disclosure on director elections could be enhanced to bring it further in line with international best practice, the company has adopted the market standard nomination system, enabling us to conclude our engagement on board issues.

Since then, the company has notably improved the quality of its reporting on food safety management, the effectiveness of its risk management and the oversight of its suppliers. An incentive scheme with four levels of risk alerts was introduced to encourage internal reporting of any identified food safety issues. Rewards are given to employees who raise food safety concerns. These attempts at changing culture have also been supported by management.

In addition, the company is studying ways to improve its water management capabilities and has started reviewing the industry’s best practices.

Share this post:
Christine Chow Dr Christine Chow manages the team of engagement associates at Hermes EOS and is responsible for the financial services, technology and extractive sectors in Asia ex-Japan. She has over 20 years of experience in portfolio management, research and investment consulting. Christine's PhD thesis on shareholder engagement for responsible investment was short-listed for a UN award in Sweden for industry relevance and academic excellence. Christine is a member of the Court of Governors of the London School of Economics and a member of the School’s Investment Sub-Committee.  She was an adjunct associate professor in the Department of Finance at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. She was also a member of the greater China committee of the Hong Kong Retirement Funds Association between 2014-2016. Christine has worked at a number of multinational corporations such as Merrill Lynch, Schroders and Hewitt. In the 1990s, she was responsible for establishing strategic partnerships in fund management for the Schroders Group, especially in Mainland China. Christine is a graduate of the London School of Economics and the University of Melbourne. She also completed an executive education course on financial engineering at Stanford University.
Read all articles by Christine Chow
Previous article:

Engagement objectives

Environmental: Food waste management, Water management disclosure

Social: Food safety management

Governance: Board independence, Board member nomination and election process

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Bill Mackenzie
  • Bruce Duguid
  • Christine Chow
  • Claire Gavini
  • Colin Melvin
  • Darren Brady
  • Dominic Burke
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Emma Hunt
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Hans-Christoph Hirt
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Jaime Gornsztejn
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Justine Lutterodt
  • Kimberley Lewis
  • Leon Kamhi
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Maxime Le Floch, CFA
  • Maxine Wille
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Michael Viehs
  • Natacha Dimitrijevic
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Rochelle Giugni
  • Roland Bosch
  • Sachi Suzuki
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Goodman
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • environment
  • eos
  • governance
  • social