We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Responsible Capitalism Survey: Many institutional investors believe ESG is not important when investing in direct property

Home / Press Centre / Responsible Capitalism Survey: Many institutional investors believe ESG is not important when investing in direct property

19 October 2015
Real Estate

Hermes Investment Management, the £29.8 billion manager focused on delivering superior, sustainable, risk adjusted returns to its clients – responsibly, has today published the third paper off the back of its annual Responsible Capitalism survey.

Responsible Capitalism and Sustainability reveals that of 109 UK and European institutional investors surveyed, 48% of respondents believe ESG factors are not important when assessing direct property investments. Only 19% consider them vitally important.

According to Chris Taylor, Head of Private Markets at Hermes Investment Management, the report shows many institutional investors are failing to recognise the importance of renewable energy and control emissions, or support both sustainable communities and social enterprises.

“Given all the information available to these investors, the results here are astounding. Even in an area where there is a regulatory imperative, such as energy efficiency, the response is alarmingly dismissive. Nearly half the investors believe energy efficiency is, by and large, unimportant, and yet it is easy to demonstrate financial savings from best practice here and reckless to ignore the red tape.

“For example, I would argue the introduction of energy performance certificates is simply another aspect of managing risk. Those investors that have decided not to anticipate regulatory change will get caught out,” he said.

Culture of short-termism: a problem for pension funds

These survey results suggest such investors are short-sighted or unduly influenced by short-termism, possibly both, which Mr. Taylor says is problematic for pension funds. And more than any other asset class, real estate warrants – and rewards – a long-term approach to investment.

“Long-term and responsible investors are very good partners for the public sector. By contrast, a private equity house – or any investor rewarded for short-term gains – is unlikely to be a particularly good partner for the public sector,” he says.

It is surprising, says Taylor that only 37% of institutional investors surveyed felt pension funds should give greater consideration to whether their investments will improve or detract from the overall quality of life experienced by beneficiaries when they retire.

“Sustainable investment is about far more than managing energy consumption or water wastage, important though they are. When we think long-term, we must consider the so-called mega trends affecting society: everything that relates to globalisation, urbanisation and technology. The glue that binds these three themes together is demographic change: lifestyle changes, how people live and how people decide to work and spend their money,” said Taylor.

King’s Cross – a living case study in sustainability

Mr. Taylor says the impact of these trends can be seen at King’s Cross, where Hermes – through its association with the developer, Argent – is part of the team transforming the former industrial blackspot into a new mixed-use district. According to Hermes, this is a 20-year project and there are at least five years to go before construction is complete and it becomes the setting for 45,000 people living, working and studying. By then there will be 2,000 new homes, 300 social housing units and two primary schools interspersed with 20 new streets and 10 public squares.

Fiduciary duty

Taylor says that Hermes has a fiduciary duty to its 300,000 pensioners. Its job is to anticipate what occupiers want from real estate because they pay the rent – and that’s investing in real estate he says, but it’s not just about floorspace.

Taylor continues: “The way to future-proof buildings – for the benefit of our investors – is to make sure they are in a sustainable, socially inclusive environment. It’s not the building that’s important but the amenity value of its location in terms of infrastructure and public realm. You need only look at the great estates of London to understand that they have endured because the integrity of the estate has been maintained, as much as the buildings.”

Leap of faith

Taylor says institutional investors need to understand that responsible investment requires a ‘leap of faith’.

“Responsible investment requires a leap of faith on the part of institutional investors. They need to anticipate change. A big hurdle here lies in the fact that the conventional fund manager’s approach to investment involves looking back on past performance, based on benchmarking by Investment Property Databank of the individual sectors of offices, retail and industrial. Long-term, mixed-use investment does not fit easily into any of those indices.

“But if we are to think about the future, rather than benchmark against the past, then as an industry we need to change our approach to investment. We need to find a different measure or set of measures – benchmarking not necessarily by sector but perhaps by asset. Over 60% of institutional investors we surveyed want their fund managers to be more transparent and share their ESG analysis on at least a quarterly basis. So the demand from clients is there: as an industry we need to meet this,” Taylor concludes.

Read the paper: Responsible Capitalism and Sustainability

Share this post:

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Amy Wilson
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Ingrid Holmes
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Kimberley Lewis
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Maxime Le Floch, CFA
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • real estate

Press contacts