We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2016, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Hermes Credit: Coco risks underappreciated

Home / Spectrum / Hermes Credit: Coco risks underappreciated

Fraser Lundie, CFA, Co-Head of Credit and Senior Credit Portfolio Manager
30 June 2014

Fraser Lundie and Mitch Reznick, Co-heads of Hermes Credit, warn that when it comes to cocos (contingent convertible bonds) investors need to be highly selective, as their risks seem  underappreciated by the market and are not always accurately factored into valuations.

Given their equity-like features, at first glance cocos offer outstanding value for fixed income investors seeking yield in otherwise expensive credit markets.

Flexible, liquid, and supposedly able to stave off a banking crisis, contingent convertible bonds – or cocos – are securities born of regulators’ design. Placed deep in the capital structure, cocos are intended to release emergency capital when a bank’s core equity falls below a set level.

But we believe the risks of the asset class – many of which stem from their equity-like characteristics – may be underappreciated by the market and are not always accurately factored in to valuations. Some cocos will not be converted into equity, but instead simply written off on a permanent or temporary basis – so investors need to be aware of both trigger points and outcomes.

In many cases, even the most equity-like cocos are priced closer to credit than to equity. The current popularity of cocos has increased contagion risk, with a trigger event likely see many investors attempt to simultaneously exit the coco market.

What happens when a coco is triggered or a bank falls foul of the regulator? The steep fall in the price of bonds issued by Groupama, the European insurance and banking group, in October 2012 provides a warning. Its bonds declined by 18% in one day when the company announced it would cancel coupons. If the instrument was a coco, investors may have been stuck without a coupon for a number of years.

Worse, because so much money has flowed into cocos, the first trigger event may spur investors across the market to reduce their exposure to the hybrids. In such a collective exodus, the danger is that there is insufficient liquidity in the market to absorb what could be a one-way trade out of these names. Contagion risk could see the securities rapidly fall in value amid one or more trigger events.

For US banks, preference shares perform a similar role to cocos and are favoured by the Federal Reserve as a means of building capital buffers. The securities are typically callable after 10 years, have non-cumulative coupons, and are issued out of the holding companies overseeing banking groups. As relative-value investors, we compared the dollar Wells Fargo 5.85% perpetual preference share, which is callable in 2023, with the BBVA 9% dollar perpetual coco, callable in 2018.

The securities displayed similar valuations, but the Wells Fargo preference share has more bondholder-friendly terms. It offers less capital appreciation, but is less volatile and generates a higher Sharpe Ratio in both price and yield terms and should therefore deliver a better risk-adjusted return.

The coco market is thriving. Abundant issuance, regulatory backing and investor demand have made it one of the most popular and talked about credit trades of the past year. Banks from Barclays to Santander now issue hybrid securities with the aim of making their balance sheets more resilient. But the opportunities it provides are balanced by risks, such as sudden-death write-down, coupon cancellation and contagion.

While we are not against the asset class, the nature and risks of cocos has compelled us to be extremely selective in this market. As with any debt security, it is imperative to assess and price as many risks as possible. However, we are not convinced that in all cases the risks of these instruments are fully priced in.


Share this post:
Fraser Lundie CFA, Co-Head of Credit and Senior Credit Portfolio Manager Fraser joined Hermes in February 2010 and is lead manager on the Hermes range of Credit strategies and co-head of credit. Prior to this he was at Fortis Investments, where he responsible for Euro High Yield.  Fraser graduated from the University of Aberdeen with an MA (Hons) in Economics and earned an MSc in Investment Analysis from the University of Stirling. He is a CFA® charterholder and member of the Association for Investment Management and Research (AIMR), having gained the UKSIP Level 3 Certificate in Investment Management (IMC). In 2013, Fraser featured  in Financial News’s ‘40 Under 40 Rising Stars of Asset Management’, an editorial selection pick of the brightest up-and-coming men and women in the industry, and in January 2015, Fraser was named as one of the top 10 star fund managers of tomorrow by The Daily Telegraph. Further information about Hermes Credit. CFA® is a trademark owned by the CFA Institute.
Read all articles by Fraser Lundie

Find posts by author

  • Andrey Kuznetsov
  • Audra Stundziaite
  • Filippo Alloatti
  • Fraser Lundie
  • Jonathan Lee
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Mitch Reznick, CFA
  • Philip Nell
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tommaso Mancuso

Find posts by category

  • Select category
  • credit