Search this website. You can use fund codes to locate specific funds

A watershed for climate change stewardship?

2021 may come to be viewed as a watershed year for climate change and investor stewardship, with votes on companies’ transition plans and COP 26 on the horizon.

If we needed more evidence that the pandemic has served as a wake-up call on climate for businesses, investors, policymakers and individuals, this year’s voting season emphatically provided that. Mainstream sentiment has shifted, and the momentum is with investors calling for faster action on climate change.

With climate transition votes on the agenda for the first time at some 18 annual shareholder meetings, the stage was set for a busy season of scrutinising the fine detail of companies’ transition strategies. Although there is regulatory and societal pressure on companies to align more quickly with the goals of the Paris Agreement, there is no established consensus or unified framework to guide an assessment of how aligned companies are. This presented investors with an analytical challenge and allowed some companies to win votes for transition plans that in our view had significant gaps or were misaligned.

Whilst we were supportive of the idea of such a vote in principle, we had some initial concerns about the concept. The high level of support for transition plans suggests these concerns were justified. There is a tendency for investors to vote in line with management, which may suggest they do not have the technical skills or the time to evaluate plans properly. We decided to apply a rigorous approach in our assessment of transition plans, setting a robust standard of alignment to the Paris Agreement goals for companies to pass. This meant that we recommended voting against some high-profile names, including Total, Glencore, Royal Dutch Shell and Aena.

This article appears in our Q2 2021 Public Engagement Report.

Related Insights

Public declaration of voting recommendations 2022
We record the public declarations that have been made so far in 2022. We plan to update this as and when we make further public declarations.
EOS Stewardship Report 2021
As EOS publishes its second UK Stewardship Report as a service provider we highlight some of the key takeaways and enhancements.
LyondellBasell case study
EOS engaged with LyondellBasell to set more ambitious climate targets.
Petrobras case study
We engaged with Petrobras in the development of its governance framework of subsidiaries.
Creating value by addressing social injustice
Social injustice occurs when people do not have access to the same rights and opportunities afforded to others, due to race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, religion, disabilities or other characteristics.
The digital dilemma
The second article in our Q1 Public Engagement Report examines how we are engaging with social media and technology companies on digital rights.

EOS Client Service and Business Development

Amy D’Eugenio,
Head of Client Service and Business Development, EOS