CLOSE

We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website https://www.hermes-investment.com, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept
CLOSE

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.

Proceed

The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Gildan: on top of its game

Hermes US SMID

Home / Gildan: on top of its game

Mark Sherlock, CFA, Lead Portfolio Manager

Improved working conditions and energy efficiency have helped create a virtuous circle for the Canadian manufacturer of active wear.

Our concern

Textile and clothing manufacturers need to be conscious of working conditions including the physical state of factories and their treatment of employees – particularly in emerging markets – to maintain the integrity of their reputations in the industry that originated the ‘sweatshop’ tag.

Between 2002 and 2004, serious allegations about exploitative labour practices were levelled at Montreal-based apparel maker Gildan. Following these claims, the company underwent an externally verified remediation process to improve practices at its production sites in Honduras, Nicaragua and Haiti. The result was the Gildan Code of Conduct, and this marked the start of the company’s development of best-in-class environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices within its industry. This discipline has helped the company improve productivity, lower costs and generate stronger returns for shareholders.

Our action

The remediation process saw Gildan introduce measures to improve workplace conditions, including health and safety training for staff, fire escapes and a medical room for night workers. The company also supports employees by offering free transport to work, subsidised meals and schools for workers’ children on site.

Measures to reduce the impact of waste and wastewater from its main production plants were also implemented, which include the recycling of any waste materials from shirt production to make socks. It created a proprietary biomass energy system to convert selected packaging and production off-cuts to help power its factories, thereby improving energy efficiency and reducing overheads. The majority of its energy now comes from renewable sources.

ESG research providers including Sustainalytics and MSCI consider the company’s approach to managing ESG risk exemplary, a view supported by the research of our in-house stewardship and engagement team.

By owning 90% of its manufacturing facilities, Gildan is able to directly reduce supply chain risk, and it provides detailed disclosures of its audit methods and results. This ownership also enables Gildan to scrutinise water consumption – a risk for clothing producers, given the water-intensive nature of their work. This insight has helped it achieve a 17% reduction in water use since 2010, with the company targeting a further 10% reduction by 2020.

Gildan’s work to improve the safety and wellbeing of employees helped it gain accreditation for the Social Compliance Program of the US Fair Labor Association (FLA), a requirement for businesses that focuses on labour practices and working conditions. The agreement insists that apparel makers’ facilities and those of their suppliers comply with specific standards, local and international law, and the principles of the FLA and Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production. For example, the company has taken steps to calculate a living wage for its workers in Honduras and the Dominican Republic, after being criticised for paying too low rates, an indicator the FLA will assess in the future. Internal and external audits of its adherence to the programme are now also performed.

In 2012, price dynamics in the commodities market and severe floods in Pakistan saw the price of cotton – Gildan’s largest input cost – spike and then collapse, affecting the stock prices of apparel makers. The Hermes US Small and Mid Cap equity team saw this volatility as an attractive entry point to the stock and initiated our position in February 2012.

The results

Gildan is not known as a desirable consumer brand, but has achieved success through the quality of its products and its ability to control costs. Higher employee satisfaction has increased staff retention and productivity, and this, combined with efficient energy usage, enables the company to consistently produce appealing garments at lower prices.

Having dominated the North American screenprint market, Gildan’s future growth is likely to be sourced from three main channels: direct screenprint, a market encompassing non-retail orders for brands such as Adidas and Disney; international screenprint, for which it has acquired a factory in Bangladesh to meet demand in Asia; and retail, a sector in which it will be a new entrant vying for business against established brands. Gildan has demonstrated that it can excel by overcoming steep challenges, and we are confident in the company’s ability to grow in all three markets.

Gildan stock price, February 2012 – April 2017

Source: Hermes, Bloomberg as at 20 April 2017

Hermes US SMID initiated a position in Gildan on 8 February 2012 and remains invested in the company.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the original amount invested.

 

Share this post:
Mark Sherlock, CFA Lead Portfolio Manager Mark joined the Hermes US SMID team in February 2009 as co-manager of the Hermes US SMID Cap strategy and became lead manager in October 2013. He became co-manager of the US All Cap strategy in May 2015. Mark initially joined Hermes in 2005 as an analyst and fund manager on the UK Focus Fund. Prior to this, he was an investment analyst at Rio Tinto Pension Fund, where he had responsibility for the small and mid cap portion of the portfolio. Mark qualified as a Chartered Accountant with PricewaterhouseCoopers in 2002. He has a degree in Politics from Durham University, is a CFA charterholder and a Fellow of ICAEW. Further information about Hermes US SMID.
Read all articles by Mark Sherlock, CFA

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Parry
  • Andrey Kuznetsov
  • Audra Stundziaite
  • Bill Mackenzie
  • Bruce Duguid
  • Chi Chan
  • Christine Chow
  • Colin Melvin
  • Darren Brady
  • Dominic Burke
  • Elena Tedesco
  • Emma Hunt
  • Eoin Murray
  • Filippo Alloatti
  • Fraser Lundie
  • Gary Greenberg
  • Geir Lode
  • Hamish Galpin
  • Hans-Christoph Hirt
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Jaime Gornsztejn
  • James Rutherford
  • Jonathan Lee
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Justine Lutterodt
  • Kunjal Gala
  • Leon Kamhi
  • Lewis Grant
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Maxine Wille
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Michael Viehs
  • Mitch Reznick, CFA
  • Natacha Dimitrijevic
  • Neil Williams
  • Nina Röehrbein
  • Patrick Marshall
  • Philip Nell
  • Rochelle Giugni
  • Roland Bosch
  • Sachi Suzuki
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tim Goodman
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • small and mid cap
  • us equities