We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie notices.

Europe’s highly-charged year

Home / Press Centre / Europe’s highly-charged year

Neil Williams, Senior Economic Adviser
07 April 2017
ArchivedMacro Economics

In his latest Ahead of the Curve monthly, Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist at Hermes Investment Management, believes Europe’s contagion this year is more likely to be political than financial. But, with the euro’s economic solution set to take years, and the monetary engine overloaded, it’s time to also crank up the fiscal side.

Opening the EU trapdoor at the worst time...
The avoidance of an extreme election outcome in The Netherlands is reassuring markets. But, tensions with Turkey have thrown up a new risk – where one country’s referendum spills over into another’s election. As for the UK, we could be inflaming the situation by opening the EU ‘trapdoor’ at such a politically sensitive time.

Tackling the cause of the euro’s underlying problems without stoking further social tension needs more than monetary expansion. So, to test whether the macro strains in the periphery are still holding back the core members, we update our ‘Misery Indices’ (MIs).

Off-the-wall methods for proxying economic hardship include an index adding together a country’s unemployment and inflation rates. Though hardly scientific, they become especially flawed in a low inflation world when the components may move in opposite directions. We thus offer a more logical alternative to previous MIs, and to conventional GDP estimates, for example, which are produced with a lag and frequently revised. Our MIs are the sum of two parts:

• the absolute divergence of a country’s CPI inflation from the 1.9%yoy synthetic average since convergence was kick-started by the Maastricht agreement, in February 1992; added to
• the divergence between that country’s unemployment rate and, to gauge the economic cycle, its previous five-year rolling average.

Chart 1 shows our predictions for 2017 and 2018. Rising MIs predict greater expected economic hardship, relative to that country’s recent past.

Chart 1. The method & sample data behind our Misery Indices (MIs)
The higher the ‘Misery Index’, the greater the economic hardship

First, after a marked deterioration in euro-zone members’ MIs during the global crisis, improvement since 2014 looks like being sustained. As a bloc, the euro-zone’s (weighted) MI, at -1, this year should be its lowest since 2007.

Second, it’s not surprising to see as the ‘most miserable’ some of those members running austerity to cut deficits and debt. In 2017 Italy will, for the eighth year running, lie in the above-average-misery zone in chart 1. However, even this is much improved on 2010-14, and further gains look likely across the periphery.

Chart 2. Meaning their divergence from the core is correcting
The higher the ‘Misery Index’, the greater the economic hardship


Unhelpful euro-zone divergence is correcting...
Third, most revealing is what our MIs say about convergence. Chart 2 shows the two stages of convergence: from Maastricht in 1992 to the euro’s birth; thereafter, with the euro, a steady re-widening as policy discipline waned.

Our MIs confirm that convergence after Maastricht was solid. They proxy convergence by tracking the highest and lowest MIs each year. In 2017, Spain looks the ‘happiest’ relative to its recent past (where GDP last year grew 3%yoy), with Finland/Italy the ‘most miserable’ (GDP +1%yoy). Greater convergence is shown by the narrowing gap between the two extremes. It suggests misery is back down to when the euro became the single currency, with the gains driven by the periphery.

This combination of reducing macro strains in the periphery with a relatively slower improvement in the core means the divergence since 2008 is correcting. This is encouraging, though not of course sufficient for returning to economic health. This still rests on the core members, which account for 80% of euro-zone GDP.

Yet, despite the relative improvement, it will take years before the converging countries can reclaim their GDP. The typical lags involved point to structural unemployment remaining high, while the reform needed for greater economic union unintentionally holds back growth.

But, while far from fixed, the worst of the euro-zone’s macro strains does at least look behind us. Which is just as well, given the years it’ll take to reach the “balanced growth” sought by G20 governments, and - critically in 2017 - Europe’s highly-charged political year.

To read Ahead of the Curve in full, please click:

Share this post:
Neil Williams Senior Economic Adviser Neil joined Hermes in August 2009 and is responsible for Hermes’ economic research. He has a forward-looking approach to generate investment strategy ideas. Neil adopts top-down methods – macro and market analysis to identify interest rate and credit value, and sovereign default risk. Neil began his career in 1987 at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), becoming its youngest ever Head of Economic Policy. He went on to hold a number of senior positions in investment banks - including Director of Bond Research at UBS, Head of Research at Sumitomo International, Global Head of Emerging Markets Research at PaineWebber International, and, before coming to Hermes, Head of Sovereign Research and Strategy at Mizuho International. Neil has 30 years’ industry experience and earned an MA in Economics in 1986 from Manchester University, having the previous year completed his BSc (Hons), also in Economics, from University College Swansea.
Read all articles by Neil Williams

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • archived
  • macro economics

Press contacts