We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Avoiding the tech hubris premium

Home / Press Centre / Avoiding the tech hubris premium

13 August 2015
Global Equities

In the Hermes Global Equities team’s latest investment update, Geir Lode, Head of Hermes Global Equities and Portfolio Manager of the Hermes Global Equity Fund, navigates the increasingly divergent tech sector to highlight five diverse stocks he believes can deliver strong, sustainable returns to investors.

There has been a real divergence in the tech sector between the consumer-facing innovators and the hard component stocks. While tech stars such as Amazon and Facebook steal the headlines, we are finding value in unloved semi-conductors and hard component companies.

Innovative tech firms are shaping the world, but what we look at is the shape of future shareholder returns. It is our job to consider whether company management carries a hubris premium. We must ask whether company management is empire-building or constructing a platform for sustainable returns to shareholders.

This is perhaps best epitomised by Elon Musk’s, Tesla CEO, 2012 lofty vision of a solar-powered ‘Hyperloop’ that would take passengers from Los Angeles to San Francisco in 25 minutes. This type of idea has the ability to change the world but it will mean billions in terms of capital allocation risk. For us, company management must demonstrate a pathway to future profits and returns to shareholders.

We like stocks with robust financial statements, competitive strength and a proven ability to consistently beat revenue and earnings expectations. Ideally, these companies should also be guided by impressive management teams and mitigate ESG risks. We assess each stock’s value, growth and quality characteristics, along with market sentiment towards the company, to find those with the optimum combinations.

Our process does not discount all big name tech companies, but we select those companies with management that demonstrate restraint in growth projects and a commitment to return cash to shareholders. Alongside some household consumer-facing names with this type of profile, we highlight some interesting hard component companies that are flying below the radar.


Google is one of the stellar names in our portfolio. The tech giant is seeking to branch out into new growth projects from driverless cars to wearable technology, but they are conducting this activity at a relatively modest scale. For example, Google Ventures provides capital funding to bold new companies independent of Google. Since we have owned the company, it has delivered strong earnings. It is trading at an attractive valuation and, crucially, the company is still growing.


The Apple share price has been undergoing some recent volatility, but we remain supporters of the stock. People tend to get hung up on things like new products and how many are they selling, and when will they disclose the numbers, but we think you need to take a broader, longer-term view. There is work to be done in product transitioning in the US and Europe, but if you look at the quality of their product lines versus the competition and the company’s enormous cash pile, we believe Apple remains in a very strong market position.

 Lam Research

Lam is a leading supplier of wafer fabrication equipment and services to the global semiconductor industry. It develops innovative solutions that help its customers build smaller, faster, more powerful electronic devices. We think Lam has a very strong product line. The company is growing its market share and we are impressed about how the management is building the business. We have high confidence in the model.


ASML is a Dutch company that is currently the largest supplier in the world of photolithography systems for the semiconductor industry. The company is impressively growing the breadth of its technology. Success depends, to an extent, on how they will be able to penetrate the market with new products, but we believe this company should also be able to grow a strong franchise.

Micron Technology

This US-based company manufactures memory chips. This is deep cyclical name that is down 75-80% since its peak. Ten years ago there were tens of players in this space. Now with just two key players withstanding, the duopoly situation should give more cover going forward. The company is still making money, and it has cash on its balance sheet, so we can wait for a rebound. We expect a high return on capital going forward, given the size of the industry.

Share this post:

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Amy Wilson
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Ingrid Holmes
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Kimberley Lewis
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Maxime Le Floch, CFA
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • global equities

Press contacts