Search this website. You can use fund codes to locate specific funds

Playing catch up – the challenge for Japan

Japan has been a notable laggard in two critical areas – climate change and gender equality. How are we engaging with Japanese companies and policymakers to accelerate the energy transition and support women in the workplace?

In late October 2020, Japan’s Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga set a target for carbon neutrality by 2050. However, Japan is struggling to phase-out coal-fired power plants and ramp up its renewable energy capacity, while the financing of coal-fired power stations overseas by Japan’s banks has attracted investor ire.

Meanwhile, Japan was ranked 121st in the Gender Gap Index in 2020, the worst performance among developed nations. It also ranked 131st in terms of the proportion of women in senior and leadership positions, well below the world average, while ranking poorly in terms of the gender pay gap.

We have accelerated our engagement with Japanese companies on equality and diversity in recent years and in 2019 we started to incorporate this into our voting policy for Japan. In 2020, we raised our expectations for TOPIX 100 companies, wanting to see women account for at least 10% of board members.

In addition to our company engagements on climate, since 2019 we have incorporated various metrics into our global voting policies to measure how well companies are responding to the need to align with the Paris Agreement. We have written to the chairs of companies scoring below a Transition Pathway Initiative Level 3 management rating (Level 4 for companies with a high exposure to fossil fuels), planning to recommend a vote against them if our engagement does not give us assurance about their management of climate-related risks. In 2021, we introduced additional criteria, where we would consider recommending voting against the chairs of companies deemed to be expanding their coal exposure, or with high deforestation risks.

This article appears in our Q3 2021 Public Engagement Report.

Related Insights

LyondellBasell case study
EOS engaged with LyondellBasell to set more ambitious climate targets.
Petrobras case study
We engaged with Petrobras in the development of its governance framework of subsidiaries.
Creating value by addressing social injustice
Social injustice occurs when people do not have access to the same rights and opportunities afforded to others, due to race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, religion, disabilities or other characteristics.
The digital dilemma
The second article in our Q1 Public Engagement Report examines how we are engaging with social media and technology companies on digital rights.
Litmus test for chemical sector decarbonisation
We engage with some of the world’s largest chemical companies on their decarbonisation pathways and ambitions.
Chemical sector under scrutiny in EOS’s Q1 Public Engagement Report
The Q1 Public Engagement Report from EOS at Federated Hermes takes an in-depth look at the decarbonisation challenges faced by the chemical industry. Plus, protecting digital rights and addressing social injustice.

EOS Client Service and Business Development

Amy D’Eugenio,
Head of Client Service and Business Development, EOS