Search this website. You can use fund codes to locate specific funds

Hermes Economist: Japanification...

In his latest Economic outlook, ‘Japanification’, Neil Williams, Hermes Investment Management’s Senior Economic Adviser, argues that comparisons between G7 economies’ current experiences and those of Japan since the late 1990s are more than just a coincidence. Furthermore, he argues that this does not bode well for central banks using established methods to stoke inflation, and governments needing to appease electorates. Something else is needed.

Political risk is ‘trumping’ economics

Political risk is ‘trumping’ economics. With populism building, disparate prosperity exacerbated by QE, and stirrings that globalisation needs to reverse, a paradigm-shift is at play that may prove as forceful as the fall of communism in 1989, and even the New World Order after 1945.

Policy-makers ‘playing King Canute’ look ill-equipped to deal with this. With their traditional reaction-functions having broken, central banks are already turning dovish again. This makes comparisons with Japan - approaching its twenty-second year of policy loosening without convincing inflation - more than a coincidence.

Much of this has precedent in Japan. There, asset prices in the late 1980s were ballooning - stylised by the valuation of the Emperor’s palace grounds (at $139,000 per square foot) surpassing that of California’s total real estate. Tumbling asset prices from 1991 hurt banks’ balance sheets and collateral, contributing to economy-wide deflation by 1995. This prompted banks to write off loans, and the Bank of Japan (BoJ) in 1997-98 to mop up their commercial paper (‘QE1’).

A symbiosis started, where the MoF presiding over escalating government liabilities became reliant on the BoJ to control debt-service costs. Caught in a liquidity trap, only in 2007 did Japan recoup its pre-1988 nominal GDP. This then proved temporary into the 2008/09 global crisis.

This does not bode well for other economies. They have taken four to nine years to recoup their nominal GDP lost since the 2008 crisis. Their inflation expectations are low, even after a decade of pump-priming liquidity. And, as we know from Japan, the only real benefit from QE is to support asset prices and keep bond yields low (see chart 1).

Comparisons with Japan are more than a coincidence

Bloated asset prices are a result of QE, but they are also a reason why, in such a febrile political climate, QE cannot be reversed - for fear of losing the baby (recovery) with the bath water. Therefore, the spoils of QE will continue to centre on those (asset owners) that probably need it least.

Financial markets are rightly sensing Japanification, with government bond yields in Germany now below those of Japan. Germany’s bank margins are under pressure from negative policy rates, and some are describing the eurozone as “overbanked”. An ageing demographic, labour rigidities and pressure to devalue internally are other worrying comparators between core euro members and Japan.

Differences exist of course, but these are not reassuring. Japan in the late 1990s was acting alone, with demand-overheating being the G7’s main concern at that time, not deflation. By comparison, since 2008/09, major economies have acted swiftly, and in relative concert, to achieve similar goals, but, their inflation outlook is no more convincing. Japan has benefited from social cohesion: the LDP ruling for all but three of the past 64 years, including 1955-2009. This contrasts strongly with the disruption and growing populism in the US and Europe.

Difficult to kick the QE drug, and armories are reducing

In policy terms, there seem to be at least two common threads. First, that the QE ‘drug’ can be difficult to kick. The last time this happened was when the US pulled out of the Great Depression in the 1930s. Its QE then ran for 14 years, unbroken to 1951 (see chart 2) - despite double-digit inflation touching 20% in 1947. This was clearly a different time, but if it is a guide, we may be little more than half-way through our own QE journey.

Second, prolonging cheap money reduces central banks’ armories, diluting their ability to affect change. The dilemma now is whether they can re-equip themselves for future economic downturns, or – like Japan - preserve the status quo. Their ‘skin in the game’ suggests it will be the latter.

In which case, with the yield-clamp of QE in place, governments trying to preserve growth and appease disaffected, electorates may as well do something that justifies it. It is time to open the fiscal box.

Chart 1. Is Japan leading the way? QE is continuing to cap bond yields...

Ten-year JGB yields, vs 10-year US Treasury, Bund, & UK Gilt yields, each lagged 15 years

Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream

Chart 2. Meaning QE - as in the 1930s - will be no ‘flash in the pan’

Shows US 30-year Treasury yield, & three-month Treasury bill rate (both %), 1934-1971

Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream, & US Federal Reserve Board

Latest Articles

High Yield can be the White Knight of the Income Crisis
Marking the 10-year anniversary of our Global High Yield capabilities, Fraser Lundie, CFA, Head of Credit, explains why investors on the hunt for income amid the dividend drought should turn to high yield as a long-term, sustainable alternative.
There’s no such thing as a bear market without a bear market rally
The longest equity bull market in history (at least for the US) came to an end on the 19th February, just a couple of weeks short of its 11th birthday. .
UK IFAs report major rise in ESG allocations since start of Covid-19 outbreak
London, May 7th, 2020: Since the beginning of the Covid-19 outbreak, UK independent financial advisers (IFAs) have observed a sharp rise in the number of investors seeking to tackle environmental concerns and improve society through their investments.
Social factor outperformers prove resilient in equity markets
The scale of the pandemic and the response elicited has shone the light firmly on the ‘S’ of Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) factors, but all three issues have come to the fore as the crisis has developed.
Solving the plastic pollution problem
Aaron Hay, Lead Engager – Fixed Income and Lisa Lange, Engagement Professional for EOS, at the International Business of Federated Hermes, look at the key risks and opportunities for investors in global plastics in their latest paper, ‘Investor Expectations for Global Plastics Challenges’.
Discerning dislocations in credit markets
Markets have been roiled by extreme volatility through the course of March, driving major dislocation between recent price action and intrinsic value. Andrew Jackson, Head of Fixed Income at the International Business of Federated Hermes, assesses four sectors where pricing and value seem particularly distorted.

Press Contacts

Johnny Weir, Interim Head of Communications
Rachael Dowers, Manager - Corporate Communications
Hannah Bellfield, Assistant Manager - Corporate Communications
Harriet Hall, Associate - Corporate Communications