We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie notices.

Three risks that could slip up oil investors

Hermes Credit

Home / Perspectives / Three risks that could slip up oil investors

Audra Stundziaite, Senior Credit Analyst
28 March 2017

The fragility of oil prices has been tested by a confluence of factors over the last few weeks. We identify three further downside risks to the oil price that could drive volatility near term. By remaining aware of these risks, investors should be able to successfully navigate this environment. 

After three months of relative stability, WTI oil prices have dropped below $50 a barrel, falling 10% in two weeks. This sharp correction, prompted by persistently high US inventories and confusion related to Saudi Arabia’s February production levels, reminded investors of global oil market fragility and how quickly sentiment can turn.

Our long-term view remains the same: range-bound oil prices at $45-55 a barrel. Despite this, investors may have to endure further shorter-term oil price volatility. We believe three factors could fuel near-term risks to the downside:

Sluggish crude inventory normalisation

Despite OPEC production cuts, crude inventories in OECD countries remain high, particularly in the US where high imports have contributed to an increase. In the next few months, declining shipments from the Arabian Gulf and the end of the refinery maintenance season are expected to drive US inventory levels lower. However, any data suggesting otherwise could cause further downside volatility.

US Crude inventories remain elevated


Source: EIA

Rapid US shale production rebound

Rebounding US shale production could weigh on prices in the second quarter of 2017. Positive global oil sentiment since the end 2016, driven by larger-than-expected OPEC production cuts, has encouraged US producers to get back to work. Capital expenditures are expected to increase approximately 30% year-on-year.

While capex remains at half of the industry high in 2014, improved shale productivity that enables producers to break even at $45 a barrel, as well as a rapidly rising rig count and uncompleted well inventory, points to US production growth in 2017 – estimated at between 0.2m and 0.9m barrels per day. Was production to hit the higher end of this range, we could see oil price pressure in the second half of 2017.

Uncertainty over OPEC production

The next OPEC meeting takes place on 25 May, when the organisation will decide whether to extend production cuts. OPEC’s decision to cut production last November has been the main driver of the oil price rally and the price’s subsequent stability over the last few months.

While theories abound, it is difficult to predict the OPEC decision. At times, OPEC, and especially Saudi Arabia ahead of the pending Aramco IPO, appear to support the extension of the cuts. At others, Saudi Arabia has made it clear it ‘will not bear the burden of the free riders’ – non-OPEC producers, including US shale. Ahead of the upcoming meeting, in line with others in the past, it is likely that global oil prices will remain volatile, trading on this speculation.

Not all doom and gloom

Despite these three risks, it is not all doom and gloom in the oil markets. As the world economy is expected to grow at 3.2% in 2017, global oil demand is forecasted to rise by about 1.6m barrels per day to 99m barrels by the end of 2017. This compares to expected supply growth of about 1m barrels per day to 99.3m barrels– assuming 0.32m barrels per day growth in US production. However, it is unclear whether expected demand growth can completely absorb potential supply increases from OPEC and US shale.

In credit investing, staying cognisant of the downside risks is of vital importance. Given the risk factors discussed above and the potential associated volatility, at Hermes Credit we currently prefer higher quality energy holdings – such as lowest-cost exploration and production operators Canadian Natural Resources and Range Resources. We also like companies not directly exposed to oil price volatilities, like pipeline operators Kinder Morgan and Enbridge. There are also some specific emerging markets turnaround credit stories demonstrating significant ESG improvements – such as Petrobras.


Source: EIA, Bloomberg

Share this post:
Audra Stundziaite Senior Credit Analyst Audra joined Hermes in 2015 and is a senior credit analyst covering energy and technology sectors. Prior to this, she was an analyst at CDP Capital, a New York-based investment fund that is a subsidiary of Canada-based La Caisse. Before making the move to the buyside, Audra worked at Barclays Capital in New York, where she was an Assistant Vice President in credit research. Audra graduated with a BA from the University of Pennsylvania, with a double major in Economics and International Relations.
Read all articles by Audra Stundziaite

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Andrey Kuznetsov, CFA
  • Audra Stundziaite
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Elena Tedesco
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Gary Greenberg
  • Geir Lode
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Hamish Galpin
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Mitch Reznick, CFA
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Patrick Marshall
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tim Goodman
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • archived
  • credit