We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Ahead of the Curve: US Fed – addressing the balance sheet

Home / Press Centre / Ahead of the Curve: US Fed – addressing the balance sheet

Neil Williams, Senior Economic Adviser
07 August 2017
US Equities

In his latest Ahead of the curve, Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist at Hermes Investment Management, sets out the implications of the US Fed becoming the first central bank to suggest it’s worrying about our addiction to QE. By starting to wind down its $4.5trn stock of assets accumulated by QE, it’s about to become the test case for how to push both levers: gradual interest-rate hikes and balance-sheet reduction.

By starting QT, the Fed will take some of the heavy lifting away from rate rises…

With the Fed believing it’s the QE stock that matters, it’s sending a subtle signal that will allow it to tighten by doing nothing – that is, by no longer reinvesting the proceeds of their maturing bonds. With this in mind, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) are proposing to start phasing out US Treasury and MBS reinvestments “relatively soon”.

To quantify the impact on rates and gauge how policy should shift, we have updated our ‘Policy Looseness Analysis’. By including QE, QT, and fiscal considerations, our analysis beefs up the Fed’s Taylor Rule which currently recommends an unrealistically high and potentially damaging peak policy rate of about 4.75% (close to its long-term average). At 350bp over the Fed’s current 1.00-1.25% range, those FOMC members targeting an unusually low peak rate are, helpfully, ignoring their own Rule.

By contrast, our analysis suggests the following...

First, by sustaining the Fed’s newly proposed ‘non re-investment’ (QT) programme, the Fed could ‘take out’ or preclude as much as 130bp of further rate hikes by 2019.

As a guide, our two charts below are based on: the Fed starting QT this October at their proposed $10bn per month, gradually rising to, and, then being maintained at, a $50bn per-month pace after a review (chart 1); the Fed staff’s assertion in 2011 that $600bn of QE would have the equivalent effect to slicing an extra 75bp off the Fed funds target; and there is symmetry for QT.

Second, however, unless the Fed’s new QT programme is later accelerated, it would take till 2023 before the balance sheet is taken back to the $1trn considered ‘normal’.

This gives credence to the ‘new normal’ view of low-for-longer rates & yields…

And, third, US interest-rate normalisation will also be slow. On the basis of our analysis, even a possible $1.1trn QT by 2019, which seems likely, would leave the de facto, QT-adjusted, real funds rate negative. Furthermore, this is the case on both our (chart 2) relatively dovish and the FOMC’s hawkish interest-rate views.

What this does is give credence to the ‘new normal’ view of low-for-longer global rates and bond yields - rather than a swift ‘normalisation’ in coming years back to pre-crisis levels. Otherwise, the US’s eight-year expansion - currently the third longest in its history - may not, in summer 2019, have the accolade of becoming its longest ever.

Share this post:
Neil Williams Senior Economic Adviser Neil joined Hermes in August 2009 and is responsible for Hermes’ economic research. He has a forward-looking approach to generate investment strategy ideas. Neil adopts top-down methods – macro and market analysis to identify interest rate and credit value, and sovereign default risk. Neil began his career in 1987 at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), becoming its youngest ever Head of Economic Policy. He went on to hold a number of senior positions in investment banks - including Director of Bond Research at UBS, Head of Research at Sumitomo International, Global Head of Emerging Markets Research at PaineWebber International, and, before coming to Hermes, Head of Sovereign Research and Strategy at Mizuho International. Neil has 30 years’ industry experience and earned an MA in Economics in 1986 from Manchester University, having the previous year completed his BSc (Hons), also in Economics, from University College Swansea.
Read all articles by Neil Williams

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Amy Wilson
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Kimberley Lewis
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Maxime Le Floch, CFA
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • us equities

Press contacts