CLOSE

We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website https://www.hermes-investment.com, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2016, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept
CLOSE

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.

Proceed

The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Budget Commentary: Fiscal tweaks – a warm-up to triggering Article 50

Home / Press Centre / Budget Commentary: Fiscal tweaks – a warm-up to triggering Article 50

Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist
08 March 2017
Macro Economics

Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist at Hermes Investment Management, sets out his reaction to today’s Spring Budget:

Having set out his stall in November and still awaiting the main event – our Brexit negotiations - the chancellor’s fiscal tweaks today were never going to raise too many eyebrows. Sterling’s fall since the Brexit vote has so far cushioned the economic blow, allowing him a sunnier growth outlook for this year, and more optimistic tax-take. But, with the economy still vulnerable in what will be years of twists and turns in the negotiations, markets may approve from a macro perspective of his pocketing the windfall till it’s needed most.

Mr Hammond is thus sticking with his ‘Plan A’ – to ease the fiscal headwinds ahead by no longer aiming to return the finances from red to black by 2019/20 as Mr Osborne had wanted. Yet, with borrowing stubbornly high and Brexit looming, his fiscal-guard’s still up, with the squeeze just deferred. Even with the £23.5bn lobbed off his borrowing plans over five years, Brexit savings will not be enough to counter the approaching £100bn extra still needed, relative to this time last year.

As expected, there were follow-through commitments for the lower-income end and measures to promote training and technical education, but few ‘rabbits out of hats’. And, while helpful to longer-term growth and competiveness, his measures short-term may have more micro than macro effects on the economy.

So, let’s not get carried away. The fiscal screw may have to be tightened later if he’s to hit his deadline.

First, the deficit, while falling this year, will lift in 2017/18, and could easily go on rising if growth falls away under Brexit. Even including special items like bank sales, QE proceeds, and low interest-rate assumptions, the UK’s 2.6%-of-GDP headline deficit for 2016/17 lies around the middle of the G7 range.

Second, the recovery should have squeezed the debt more than it has. Only in 2017/18 is the net-debt-to-GDP ratio expected to peak – disappointing given real GDP is about 10% up on its pre-crisis peak. This ratio, at 89%, is more than twice Japan’s when Japan limped into a ‘lost decade’ in the mid 1990s.

Financing this debt may become more troublesome if we struggle with Brexit, given about one third of gilts outstanding is backed by international investors who will care about currency and ratings risk. This would disrupt the OBR’s low gilt-yield assumptions. In which case, the risk is that the BoE keeps its QE running for too long, with the unintended consequences of further asset price distortions, suppressed saving, and increased funding strains on many pension schemes.

Share this post:
Neil Williams Group Chief Economist Neil joined Hermes in August 2009 and is responsible for Hermes’ economic research. He has a forward-looking approach to generate investment strategy ideas. Neil adopts top-down methods – macro and market analysis to identify interest rate and credit value, and sovereign default risk. Neil began his career in 1987 at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), becoming its youngest ever Head of Economic Policy. He went on to hold a number of senior positions in investment banks - including Director of Bond Research at UBS, Head of Research at Sumitomo International, Global Head of Emerging Markets Research at PaineWebber International, and, before coming to Hermes, Head of Sovereign Research and Strategy at Mizuho International. Neil has 29 years’ industry experience and earned an MA in Economics in 1986 from Manchester University, having the previous year completed his BSc (Hons), also in Economics, from University College Swansea.
Read all article by Neil Williams

Find posts by author

  • Andrew Parry
  • Eoin Murray
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Neil Williams
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • macro economics

Press contacts