We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

China A Share market – worthy of its potential?

Home / Press Centre / China A Share market – worthy of its potential?

Gary Greenberg, Head of Hermes Emerging Markets
11 July 2017
Emerging Markets

China’s A share market is large, deep, volatile and dominated by retail investors, of which some 7% are rumoured to be illiterate. Capitalized at US$9 trillion, it contains many companies that are severely overvalued, inefficiently run, and that spare little thought for minority investors. While many have no investor relations contacts or even websites, a great number also have no member of senior management that speaks a foreign language, which makes communication with foreign investors near impossible. Gary Greenberg, Head of Emerging Markets at Hermes Investment Management asks, should such a market become part of a benchmark for global investors?

At a US$9 trillion market capitalization, Chinese A shares should not be ignored, but clearly governance standards have to rise. However, China is in many ways a world unto itself. Most of China’s corporate, provincial, and national debt is owed to itself, and much of China A shares’ equity is owned by Chinese entities, often a municipality or a province. In fact, the most influential person in management in a Chinese company may not be part of the management at all: he (usually a “he”) is a representative of the Chinese Communist Party. As a result, conflicting loyalties are very much a factor, under the surface.

China has always been a communal society, where clan and regional loyalties play a large part in the social ethos, in stark contrast to the individualism (be it rugged or refined) embraced in the West. Communal loyalties are especially strong when a company is majority owned by the city or province in which it is situated, and employs tens of thousands of people in the area. While there are a few truly national and international Chinese A share companies (the large insurers, banks, and some manufacturers like Gree, Midea, and Shanghai Automotive), the vast majority are regional players, with strong home roots.

Listing has been seen as a way to raise capital while retaining hometown control. In many emerging markets, raising equity is often viewed as a cheap way to add capital, “costing” only the dividend, and dividend pay-outs have been notably minimal. However, regulators in China are on the case: many that do not pay dividends are referred to by the chair of the local regulator, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) as ‘iron cockerels’, a Chinese idiom for cheap-skates. Thus, outside shareholders are sometimes seen as a necessary but somewhat annoying distraction from management’s day job which consists of keeping the Party Secretary happy, providing local employment, and, if possible, finding a way to get rich.

Management getting rich is of course an acceptable goal in the capitalist system, which has evolved in such a way as to facilitate this, as long as it happens alongside the outside investors, and in a proportional manner. Here is where management education comes to the fore, but also where it is lacking. Hermes, through our EOS engagement team, along with other concerned investors, work with policy makers, company boards, and regulators to share best practice and encourage its adoption. China is still at the early stages of learning best practice in governance, but our past successful engagement experience on this topic in other markets should help to accelerate the process.

Risk is high in the Chinese A share market, but potential returns are also substantial. The market’s immaturity and inefficiency provide ample opportunity for careful stock pickers to identify undervalued franchises which could turn into tomorrow’s multinationals. Furthermore, engagement provides insight into the cultural evolution of a company as it grows. In a balanced portfolio, therefore, there is a place for Chinese A shares; as governance improves, that place should expand.

Share this post:
Gary Greenberg Head of Hermes Emerging Markets Gary Greenberg joined Hermes in September 2010 in the Emerging Markets team. Previous to this, he was Managing Partner at Silkstone Capital and Muse Capital, both London-based hedge funds he co-founded and managed in 2007 and 2002, respectively. From 1999 through 2002 he was Executive Director at Goldman Sachs in New York and London, where he co-headed the Emerging Markets product for GSAM, and served on the global asset allocation and European stock selection committees. From 1998 to 1999 he was Managing Director at Van Eck Global in Hong Kong and New York, where he was the lead portfolio manager for International Equities and ran the Hong Kong Office. From 1994 through 1998 Gary was Chief Investment Officer at Peregrine Asset Management in Hong Kong, managing and supervising global and regional equity, plus fixed income funds. In the early years of his career he was a Principal of Wanger Asset Management in Chicago, where he co-founded and co-managed the Acorn International Fund, which grew to $1.4 billion under his tenure. Gary holds an MBA from Thunderbird School, a BA from Carleton College and is a CFA charterholder. In 2017 Hermes Global Emerging Markets was named best emerging markets fund for the second year in a row at the Fund Manager of the Year Awards and best emerging markets group by Citywire Deutschland, and Gary was named best manager for emerging markets equity by Citywire UK.
Read all articles by Gary Greenberg

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Maxime Le Floch, CFA
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • emerging markets

Press contacts