CLOSE

We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website https://www.hermes-investment.com, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2016, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept
CLOSE

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

Proceed

The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Eurozone – closing the gap?

Home / Chief Economist / Eurozone – closing the gap?

13 January 2016
Economics

In his January 2016 Ahead of the Curve, Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist at Hermes Investment Management, explores how the Eurozone is coping with its underlying problem – monetary union without economic union.

With the ECB unable to rely on the US Fed’s gentle tightening path to do the work for it in 2016, expect further forays into the ‘unconventional’, including a step-up in QE and, importantly, even more negative interest rates.

But, while helpful in addressing the symptom, deflation, Mr Draghi cannot alone be expected to solve the underlying problem - a monetary union devoid of economic union. This will take years.

To show the progress so far, we update our Competitiveness Analysis to the end of 2015. As an amorphous bloc, after five years of austerity the zone is regaining competitiveness lost since the euro. Yet, shifts in individual members’ competitiveness within the Eurozone are still too disparate to rule out further pressure (see my chart below).

We use the OECD’s latest estimates to the end of 2015 of a country’s unit labour costs in tradable goods, relative to its main trading partners’ (RULC). The average is weighted, then indexed to a 2010 base year (=100). A rising index indicates a de facto real effective exchange rate appreciation and falling competitiveness. An index fall signifies a relative cut in unit labour costs and, thus, a competitiveness boost. The results are summarised in the chart.

On this basis, Germany is the biggest ‘winner’, and, encouragingly, Spain and Italy’s positions are now improving rapidly. But, France is lagging.

And, after impressive gains, there may be a limit to how far Spain and Italy can reform, given male youth unemployment rates of 48% and 38%. Their real household spending is still 6-10% down on 2008, yet Germany’s is 7% up.

Then there’s Greece, whose deflation improved competitiveness, but exacerbated its real-debt dynamics. Without debt relief, its €86bn package is only a ‘sticking plaster’. After losing 22% of real GDP since 2010, it now has reform fatigue.

A Greece debt restructuring in 2016 thus seems inevitable - though, encouragingly, with 80% of Greece’s liabilities held by the IMF/ECB, the fall-out for private markets should be contained. Either way, the ECB stands ready to act - whatever the US Fed is doing.

neileu

 

Read Ahead of the Curve

Share this post:

Find posts by author

Find posts by category

  • Select category
  • economics

Press contacts