We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie notices.

Digging through the oil sands

An investor tour

Home / EOS Blog / Digging through the oil sands

Bill Mackenzie, Senior Adviser
11 December 2015

An incomprehensible landscape greeted us at Shell’s Jackpine oil sands mine in Northern Alberta, Canada.

On the flight from Calgary to Northern Alberta, there is much to see that documents the importance of oil to this region.

Shell Bill 4 cropped

Boreal forests are clearly carved into rectangular sections by seismic lines cut by past exploration activities, thus compromising the safety of wildlife from predators. Further along, steam and smoke plumes are the first visible markers of the oil sands mining operations.

Shell Bill 3 cropped

On site, the size of the mine pit at Jackpine is difficult to evaluate, as are the towering dikes of the tailings ponds and the sprawling hills of overburden, which is catalogued and slated for reclamation once mining operations are complete.

Investor tour
A follow-up to our 2009 visit to Shell’s adjacent Muskeg mine, the investor tour of Jackpine gave us the opportunity to evaluate to what extent emissions reduction has become a core value at Shell’s Canadian upstream and midstream operations. An hour into presentations at the Jackpine administration building, we could sense that Shell is striving to have the right culture in place.  Since 2010, the company’s modelling has factored in a carbon price of $40/per tonne, and any new project deemed risky from a greenhouse gas emissions perspective must consider CO2 abatement. Shell built Jackpine based on the experience it gained from operating its older Muskeg mine.  Efficiency has led to lower production costs, which is helped by the availability of the company’s own refinery in the province. Shell also plays a leading role in Canada’s Oil Sands Innovation Alliance (COSIA), an alliance of 13 competing oil producers aiming to share environmental technology and accelerate the pace of development of solutions for the environmental problems facing the industry.

New technologies
Shell is putting new technologies to work as it is undertaking its first tailings pond reclamation at its Muskeg mine.  The company is also progressively reclaiming some large areas we were able to see as we left the Muskeg Mine site. The portable centrifuges Shell uses to help separate the water from sediment to allow the ponds to harden is just one example of how Shell has benefited from participation in COSIA.

Scotford upgrader and refinery
Shell Bill 6 croppedOn day two, we visited the Scotford upgrader and refinery. That a facility built in 1984 can boast to be the most efficient in North America highlights the maturity of the petroleum cycle. Nevertheless, Shell is operating a tight ship at Scotford, with its safety culture and commitment to reduce emissions evident throughout our visit.

Carbon capture and storage
The company focuses on carbon dioxide emissions resulting from its activities and believes carbon capture and storage is vital to the industry. The Quest carbon capture and storage project at Scotford began operating just days before our visit. Shell Bill 1 croppedThis ground-breaking 25-year life project annually captures and stores over one million tonnes of CO2 securely two kilometres underground, the equivalent of about one third of the emissions generated by the upgrader at Shell’s Scotford operation. Baseline CO2 emissions data meanwhile has been collected along the pipeline route and extensive monitoring systems are in place.

Community support
Community support for the project was obtained through  a seven-year engagement programme with the local population, which had been developed with help from the respected NGO, Pembina Institute. As a top- rated member of the Canadian Council for Aboriginal Business, Shell Canada has demonstrably strong relations with local first nations.

The female president of Shell Canada  – notable in the male-dominated Canadian oil and gas sector - meanwhile has clearly forged good relations with the newly elected Premier of the province of Alberta. This has helped expedite the implementation of a more effective regulatory framework for oil sands mine tailings management.

Low oil price concerns
However, potentially weighing on Shell’s ongoing environmental and social programmes is the continuous low price of oil.  With Shell’s Arctic programme and Carmon Creek in-situ projects now on hold, we are concerned about what effects ongoing low oil prices might have on the funding of Shell’s environmental initiatives and, perhaps even more importantly, on COSIA activities.

Share this post:
Bill Mackenzie Senior Adviser William (Bill) Mackenzie joined Hermes EOS as a senior adviser and its representative in Canada in January 2009. He is a member of the investment committee and the responsible investment working group of the United Church of Canada Pension Fund. Until 2009, Bill was director of special projects with the Canadian Coalition for Good Governance (CCGG) and continues to be involved in the activities of the CCGG, including its public policy committee, as a representative of Hermes EOS. Prior to working with the CCGG, Bill was president of Institutional Shareholder Services Canada and its predecessor Fairvest Corporation. Bill’s career in corporate governance spans over 28 years and he continues to promote corporate governance and responsible investment in Canada through his participation on various industry committees and boards, writing articles and speaking at conferences. Bill earned the ICD.D designation of the Institute of Corporate Directors in 2004 and has a diploma in Business Administration from Ryerson Polytechnical University.
Read all articles by Bill Mackenzie
Previous article:
Mining oil with steam
Next article:
Looking into 2016

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Bill Mackenzie
  • Bruce Duguid
  • Christine Chow
  • Claire Gavini
  • Colin Melvin
  • Darren Brady
  • Dominic Burke
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Emma Hunt
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Hans-Christoph Hirt
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Jaime Gornsztejn
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Justine Lutterodt
  • Leon Kamhi
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Maxine Wille
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Michael Viehs
  • Natacha Dimitrijevic
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Rochelle Giugni
  • Roland Bosch
  • Sachi Suzuki
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Goodman
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • environment
  • social