We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

China Mobile

Anti-bribery and board composition efforts

Home / EOS Case Studies / Hermes EOS case study: China Mobile

China Mobile is a majority state-owned telecommunications company that provides mobile voice and related services in Mainland China and Hong Kong. It is the world’s largest mobile operator by network scale and customer base. Given the ownership structure, our engagement has focused on improving the transparency of the board and ensuring that the views of minority shareholder rights are taken into consideration, especially on issues such as capital efficiency, director nominations and board composition.

A number of the company’s senior executives were jailed for life due to their involvement in bribery and corruption between 2011 and 2014. In total, the bribes and kickbacks amounted to $67 million[1].

What we did
We began engagement with China Mobile in 2012 following a number of serious bribery and corruption allegations concerning its senior executives. We encouraged the company to locate and rectify the apparent weaknesses in its policies and systems and pressed it to learn from individual cases to improve its internal controls and risk management. In addition, we explored the nomination process of its board directors, specifically how the nomination committee ensures adequate experience and skills of the independent directors to enable them to oversee all aspects of the company’s performance. We recommended it undertake an external, independent board evaluation and managed to gather the support of 13 other institutional investors with $2 trillion in assets to lead a collaborative engagement advocating best practice for the nomination and assessment of board directors. In relation to bribery and corruption, we sought evidence of a change in culture and staff behaviour, which we believed to be core to addressing the root causes of the problems. In addition, we encouraged improved disclosure on a range of environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues without setting specific objectives.

The company’s first independent director with IT expertise joined the board in 2013. In 2016, China Mobile conducted an external board evaluation. Equally positive, its ESG disclosure has improved significantly over the past few years – in its sustainability report, as well as on the company’s website. The company is the first Mainland Chinese company to attain Band A ranking in CDP’s climate change disclosure survey. It also published a policy and corresponding due diligence guide for responsible supply chain management in 2016.

China Mobile has made demonstrable efforts to tackle bribery and corruption by analysing all the corruption cases it had identified since 2011. To show its commitment to cultural change, it held educational seminars on the topic for its employees. These examples are publicly available and were reported on in local media. We also commended its open admission of the bribery issues identified, its demonstrable commitment to change and setting a positive example for other companies. The company verified all whistle-blowing reports and set up a coordination mechanism encompassing material verification, external investigation support and special case coordination. It also required the family of management staff to sign an anti-bribery and corruption pledge.

The improvements made by the company over the last two years are in line with the bribery and corruption assessment by the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (CCDI), the central government’s special branch for compliance assessment. The CCDI’s 28-page report is available on the government's website, covering the issues identified to be at risk, the number of people penalised and the reasons for the penalties, down to the provincial level.

In May 2017, we spoke at the company’s AGM, calling for improvements to its capital allocation and efficiency, with clear guidance on the overall approach to the use of cash. We also requested that the company strengthen the board’s expertise in emerging areas crucial to telecommunications. We will continue to monitor improvements in board composition and effectiveness.


By using the links above you will be leaving the Hermes website. Hermes has no control over the content on third party websites.
    Share this post:
    Christine Chow Dr Christine Chow is responsible for the financial services, technology and extractive sectors in Asia ex-Japan. She has 19 years of experience in portfolio management, research and investment consulting. Christine's PhD thesis on shareholder engagement for responsible investment was short-listed for a UN award in Sweden for industry relevance and academic excellence. She is an adjunct associate professor in the Department of Finance at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. She is a governor of the London School of Economics and a member of the university’s investment committee. She was also a member of the greater China committee of the Hong Kong Retirement Funds Association between 2014-2016. Christine has worked at a number of multinational corporations such as Merrill Lynch, Schroders and Hewitt. In the 1990s, she was responsible for establishing strategic partnerships in fund management for the Schroders Group, especially in Mainland China. Christine is a graduate of the London School of Economics and the University of Melbourne. She also completed an executive education course on financial engineering at Stanford University.
    Read all articles by Christine Chow

    Engagement objectives

    Social: Bribery and Corruption

    Governance: Composition and effectiveness of the board of directors

    Find posts by author

    • Alex Knox, ACA
    • Bill Mackenzie
    • Bruce Duguid
    • Christine Chow
    • Colin Melvin
    • Darren Brady
    • Dominic Burke
    • Emma Hunt
    • Hans-Christoph Hirt
    • Ilana Elbim
    • Jaime Gornsztejn
    • Justine Lutterodt
    • Leon Kamhi
    • Louise Dudley
    • Mark Sherlock, CFA
    • Maxine Wille
    • Michael Russell, CFA
    • Michael Vaughan
    • Michael Viehs
    • Natacha Dimitrijevic
    • Nina Röhrbein
    • Philip Nell
    • Rochelle Giugni
    • Roland Bosch
    • Sachi Suzuki
    • Saker Nusseibeh
    • Tatiana Bosteels
    • Tim Goodman
    • Tommaso Mancuso
    • Yasmin Chowdhury

    Find posts by category

    • eos
    • governance
    • social
    • stewardship