We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

America: land of opportunity for SMID investors

Hermes US SMID

Home / Perspectives / America: land of opportunity for SMID investors

Mark Sherlock, CFA, Head of US Equities
28 November 2016
Small and Mid Cap

The fiscal expansion and deregulation expected under incoming US President Donald Trump, plus the concentrated domestic exposure provided by smaller companies, are convincing reasons to look down the market-cap spectrum for opportunities to outperform.

All change: a new investment environment dawns

The dramatic shift in US leadership has fundamentally changed the outlook for domestic small- and mid-cap (SMID) stocks. The consensus view that the economy was locked in a low-growth, low-inflation mode should be revisited. Markets have responded positively to pro-growth policies put forward by Trump, such as spending $1tn on infrastructure and slashing the corporate tax rate from 35% to 15%.

Such policies are likely to proceed given the Republicans’ control of Congress, and in time should boost growth and inflation in an economy that was beginning to accelerate – US real GDP increased at an annual rate of 2.9% in Q3, more than doubling the pace of growth recorded in Q2.

Trump’s policies mark a change in the efforts of US authorities to stimulate growth. The Federal Reserve’s use of monetary policy since the financial crisis, which has driven prices for income-producing assets higher but had a limited effect on the real economy, is now likely to be replaced by fiscal stimulus.

Treasuries have already sold off on the near-term prospect of the Fed raising the official interest rate in December and the long-term risk of higher inflation (see figure 1). We believe that this is the first phase of a wider rebalancing by investors away from inflation-sensitive bonds towards pro-growth equities.

Figure 1. End of an era: long-term US bond yields spike on growth expectations


Source: Bloomberg as of 23 November 2016.

Next year, the Fed is likely to hike interest rates two or more times, in addition to the probable increase in December. Given that small-cap stocks tend to outperform large caps during tightening cycles1, now is an opportune time for investors to consider establishing or increasing their exposure to robust smaller companies that are prone to benefit from the new investment environment.

For growth, look down the market-cap spectrum

This changing backdrop suggests that the currently popular positioning in large-cap defensive stocks may no longer be a winning strategy. We see two clear reasons why smaller US companies are now particularly attractive relative to large caps: industry exposures and valuations.

US SMID stocks typically have a 70% to 80% exposure to the domestic economy, compared with 50% for large caps. Within this, smaller companies are substantially better represented in the industrial and financial sectors, and should generate stronger relative earnings momentum due to increased infrastructure spending and the margin-boosting effects of a steeper yield curve and higher short-term interest rates (see figure 2).

Figure 2. Favourably exposed: sector weightings of Hermes US SMID and the Russell 2500


Source: Bloomberg as at November 2016

Given these powerful fundamental drivers, US SMID stocks represent good value relative to large caps. Their current premium of a 1.1x price-to-earnings multiple over large caps is lower than the long-term average of 2x, suggesting that the market has not fully factored in the strength of the growth outlook for these companies2.

In contrast, large-cap defensive stocks appear expensive relative to small caps (see figure 3). Persisting with an allocation to these businesses at the expense of smaller companies may incur significant opportunity cost.

Figure 3. Valuations: large caps v small caps in the US


Source: “US equity strategy: Valuation rundown,” by Lori Calvasin et al. Published by Credit Suisse on 14 November 2016.

Where top-down analysis meets bottom-up opportunity

Such top-down considerations are integrated into our bottom-up analysis of stocks, and we currently hold many high-quality businesses that are poised to benefit from the new investment environment. They include:

  • MSC Industrial, a distributor of metalworking, maintenance and repair supplies, which should benefit from a recovery in industrial activity after two tough years. Rising inflation would provide an additional tailwind
  • Signature Bank, a position we have recently increased amid market concerns that the lender was exposed to credit losses – we judged that its valuation had already been adjusted for this and that the company had largely increased its reserves. Recent research shows that the upside potential for banks could result in a stock-price increase of 48% for Signature Bank

US SMID stocks: now is the time

In the year to date, the Hermes US SMID Equity Fund has outperformed its benchmark, the Russell 2500, by a net 5.5% in US dollar terms. The Fund also generated net annualised outperformance of 9.6% and 8% in US dollar terms for the one- and three-year periods ending 31 October3.

These returns place the Fund first in its Morningstar peer group for the one-year period ending 30 September and seventh over three years4.

We focus on identifying attractive entry points into high-quality businesses benefiting from durable competitive advantages. We believe that our proven stock-picking approach, combined with the favourable conditions for US SMID companies, present a compelling argument for investment.

  1. 1 “How to invest as interest rates rise,” by Joe Light. Published in The Wall Street Journal on 3 January 2014
  2. 2 Source: Bloomberg as at 23 November 2016
  3. 3 Source: Hermes as at November 2016. Performance shown is the Hermes US SMID Equity Fund in USD, net of fees. The value of investments and income from them may go down as well as up, and you may not get back the original amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results and targets are not guaranteed.
  4. 4 Source: Hermes as at November 2016. The peer group is the EAA OE US Mid-Cap Equity Morningstar Category. 
Share this post:
Mark Sherlock, CFA Head of US Equities

Mark joined the Hermes US SMID team in February 2009 as co-manager of the Hermes US SMID Cap strategy and became lead manager in October 2013. He became co-manager of the US All Cap strategy in May 2015 and in October 2017 was appointed Head of US Equities. Mark initially joined Hermes in 2005 as an analyst and fund manager on the UK Focus Fund. Prior to this, he was an investment analyst at Rio Tinto Pension Fund, where he had responsibility for the small- and mid-cap portion of the portfolio. Mark qualified as a Chartered Accountant with PricewaterhouseCoopers in 2002. He has a degree in Politics from Durham University, is a CFA charterholder and a Fellow of ICAEW.

Read all articles by Mark Sherlock, CFA

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Amy Wilson
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Andrey Kuznetsov, CFA
  • Audra Stundziaite
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Elena Tedesco
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Gary Greenberg
  • Geir Lode
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Hamish Galpin
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Ingrid Holmes
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Kimberley Lewis
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Maxime Le Floch, CFA
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Mitch Reznick, CFA
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Patrick Marshall
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tim Goodman
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • small and mid cap

Press contacts