We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Reaction to ECB rate decision

Home / Perspectives / Reaction to ECB rate decision

10 March 2016
Macro Economics

Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist at Hermes Investment Management, reacts to today’s ECB rate decision:

By ‘pushing out the boat on QE2’ a little further, cutting rates again, and setting up from June new longer-term refinancing operations for banks, the ECB probably offered as much as it could today from its emptying policy ‘tool-box’.

Euro-zone GDP may be back to its pre-crisis level, but with headline inflation still a world away from its 2% target, the damp squib of December’s QE extension, and the euro’s ascent since, Mr Draghi was always going to act today - on his first anniversary of QE.

Mr Draghi ‘pushes out the boat on QE2’ a little further
Firstly, by upping the pace of QE, to €80bn from €60bn purchases per month, and including more corporate bonds, he is turning the liquidity tap a little harder.

And secondly, to get ‘bang for his buck’, he rightly shaved interest rates again, including taking the key deposit rate further into negative territory. But, the only 10bp cut to -0.4% is puny. Aimed at discouraging cash hoarding, even more negative rates may follow if the liquidity QE throws up is to be pushed out to where it matters most – consumers and businesses.

Also, a big problem with QE is it provides cash to lend, but cannot force consumers and firms to borrow. As the ECB’s own bank lending survey reveals, credit supply at a five-year high is not being matched by loan demand, which continues to cool. 

The effectiveness of negative rates will thus be in keeping bond yields down – given the ECB’s pledge to buy government debt down to a yield that’s as low as the, now -0.4%, negative deposit rate. With some two-thirds of euro-zone private borrowing – consumer and corporate – being long-yield, rather than short-rate driven, further rate cuts seems a more hopeful, albeit indirect, route to growth.

Either way, while helpful in addressing the symptom, deflation, Mr Draghi cannot alone solve the underlying problem – a monetary union devoid of economic union. This will take years. And, meanwhile, the euro remains a currency in search of a government.

Share this post:

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Amy Wilson
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Andrey Kuznetsov, CFA
  • Audra Stundziaite
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Elena Tedesco
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Gary Greenberg
  • Geir Lode
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Hamish Galpin
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Ingrid Holmes
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Kimberley Lewis
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Maxime Le Floch, CFA
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Mitch Reznick, CFA
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Patrick Marshall
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tim Goodman
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • macro economics