We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Hermes EOS: Views on Deutsche Bank

Home / Press Centre / Views on Deutsche Bank

30 October 2015

Dr Hans-Christoph Hirt, Director at Hermes EOS:

Management board overhaul on 18 October 2015
Deutsche’s supervisory board and its new-CEO, John Cryan, reacted decisively to the concerns raised by investors and regulators about the management board with a major overhaul of its composition on 18 October 2015. We commend Deutsche’s leadership for listening to the concerns and taking some tough personnel decisions thus making possible a genuine, new beginning at top management level in preparation of the implementation of Strategy 2020.

We specifically welcome the appointment of senior executives with relevant experience and skills to the management board to focus on compliance, legal and regulatory matters and the additional accountability provided through the representation of the bank’s four main business divisions.

Details of Strategy 2020 announced on 29 October 2015
We welcome Strategy 2020’s focus on reducing Deutsche’s scope, complexity and costs and shrinking risk-weighted assets and support the objectives of strengthening capital and ultimately creating adequate returns for investors. At the same time, we welcome the recognition that significant investment in the bank’s infrastructure and information technology is necessary to make its businesses more efficient and less susceptible to conduct incidents.

Following the announcements in October, the new shape of Deutsche as a slimmed-down universal bank has started to emerge. We look forward to the management board’s execution of Strategy 2020 and delivering on the cost reduction, capital and return targets.

Concerns about conduct, risk management and culture
We are concerned that Deutsche continues to experience reported conduct incidents, such as the alleged money laundering and possible breaches of sanctions in Russia or the recently reported, accidental transfer of funds. We urge the management board to make conduct, risk management and the creation of a culture that facilitates sustainable value creation and minimises conduct incidents an integral part of Deutsche’s new business model.


Hermes EOS engagement around annual general meeting on 21 May 2015
Following a long-standing engagement with Deutsche Bank, Hermes EOS, on behalf of a group of more than 40 institutional investors, urged the supervisory board ahead of and at the annual general meeting on 21 May 2015 to review the composition of the management board. We had previously raised concerns about the management board’s delivery on key targets set under Strategy 2015+, the way it had dealt with litigation and investigations and its progress on culture change.

Co-CEOs resignation on 7 June 2015
We welcomed the resignations of the co-CEOs Anshu Jain and Jürgen Fitschen on 7 June 2015 only weeks after the shareholder meeting, at which almost 40 percent of the investors present voted against the management board, thus expressing their lack of confidence in its members and implicitly urging the supervisory board to review its composition.

Share this post:

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Amy Wilson
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Ingrid Holmes
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Kimberley Lewis
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Maxime Le Floch, CFA
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • eos
  • governance

Press contacts