Search this website. You can use fund codes to locate specific funds

The missing links in responsible supply chain management

We recently returned from the OECD’s 12th Forum on Responsible Mineral Supply Chains in Paris. The forum gave its attendees an opportunity to engage with stakeholders from miners to smelters and refiners, local communities, NGOs, government organisations from Africa’s Great Lakes region, as well as global technology, consumer and automobile companies.

We have come away with several lessons, namely that a) existing due diligence processes do not address human rights issues at mines, b) that managing supply chains is part of risk management and that the root cause of child labour is poverty and c) that the employment status of miners in cooperatives is crucial.

Existing due diligence processes do not address human rights issues at mines

The five-step framework of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas is closely followed by the Responsible Minerals Initiative, which conducts supplier due diligence for global companies.

However, as the due diligence processes only extend to the smelters, they fail to address the issue of labour exploitation, including child labour. This is crucial as the most severe and salient human rights risks tend to occur in the trading process or at the mines, at large-scale as well as artisanal, small-scale mines (ASM), before minerals such a cobalt even reach the smelters.

As shown in a series of reports and short films on child labour in the cobalt supply chain by news network CNN, children follow their parents into mine work. They are involved in transporting and eventually trading minerals in the local markets. Encouragingly, following the latest report, companies such as car manufacturer Daimler have promised to extend their efforts in supply chain management to the mine level.

We believe that downstream companies have a responsibility to ensure total transparency in their end-to-end supply chains. Simply pushing this responsibility to upstream suppliers to address the human rights issues indicates a lack of accountability.

Supply chains are part of risk management, but the root cause of child labour is poverty

It is too simple to say that we can avoid child labour if we stop purchasing from ASMs. As the demand for and prices of cobalt surge, larger mines may still have to purchase minerals from their smaller peers to meet demand.

In addition, a fifth of the world’s cobalt comes from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where communities may find cobalt in the grounds of their houses or in their backyards. According to local NGOs, such as Buon Pastore and PACT, families have been relocated from these backyard mines. Some have been adequately compensated but others have not. The remediation process is non-transparent and may even be unfair. This contradicts the recommendations of the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights. We therefore encourage downstream companies to partner up with local NGOs to help develop alternative sources of incomes for the local population.

We believe that the key to addressing the risk management aspects of supply chains is to establish a traceability system that certifies the origin of the mineral. This will have the added benefit of reducing bribery, corruption and money laundering risks in the opaque local trading system. Above and beyond risk management, companies should also consider their impact on society and understand what positive developments they could contribute to within the realms of their operations.

The importance of the employment status of miners in cooperatives. Are they dependent workers or freely self-employed?

In 2015, the World Bank updated the international poverty line (IPL) to $1.90 a day. The minimum wage in the DRC was last revised in January 2009. It is 1,680 Congolese francs per day, the equivalent of $1.04 today and 50% below the IPL.

In the UK, the Taylor Review of Modern Working practices clarified the employment status of contract workers. As many of the miners or diggers are deemed to be dependent workers with few or no alternatives of employment in the mining regions, we question whether they should be considered self-employed in the state-managed cooperatives, as they are now, or whether they should be classed as dependent workers. And if they are dependent workers, whether they should be entitled to minimum employment benefits is an important topic for wider discussions.

One immediate action that should be taken is to revise the minimum wage in the DRC. Another is to conduct a wider consultation on the labour practices of some strategically important sectors, such as mining, in the Great Lakes region.

By using the links above, you will be leaving the Hermes website. Hermes has no control over the content on third party websites.

Related Articles

Public declaration of voting recommendations 2022
EOS Stewardship Report 2021
LyondellBasell case study

EOS Client Service and Business Development

Amy D’Eugenio,
Head of Client Service and Business Development, EOS