We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Four causes for concern in the tech sector

Home / Perspectives / Four causes for concern in the tech sector

Audra Stundziaite, Senior Credit Analyst
30 July 2015

Aided by a Windows XP refresh cycle and solid growth in smartphone sales in 2014, the technology sector outperformed the US High Yield index last year. Recent developments, however, make us more cautious, says Audra Stundziaite, Analyst at Hermes Credit.

1. PC market weakens after XP refresh cycle in 2014

In the last few years, the PC market has shrunk due to the proliferation of smartphones and tablets. In 2014, this decline has slowed amid the XP refresh cycle (see figure 1). Since IBM stopped providing support for Windows XP in April 2014, businesses have been forced to upgrade to newer machines that could efficiently run modern operating systems, such as Windows 7 or Windows 8. This refresh cycle boosted the 2014 operating results of companies in PC supply chain, including original equipment manufacturers and chipmakers. In 2015, however, the trend is reversing. According to Gartner, 2Q15 global PC shipments declined 9.5% y/y, the steepest decline since 3Q13. The fall is being exacerbated by the pause in sales through August ahead of the launch of Windows 10 in 3Q15. The strong USD dollar is not helping either, and increases in prices to protect margins are suppressing demand outside of the US. Recent commentary from Intel raises further concern: in its 2Q15 earnings release, the company’s management forecast a high-single-digit drop in sales across the PC  market, up from  a previously anticipated mid-single-digit decline.

Figure 1. The decline of worldwide PC shipments

Source: Barclays as at April 2015

2. Smartphone growth slowing as the China market matures

Smartphone shipments continue to grow, driven by demand for lower-priced models in south-east Asia, the Middle East and Africa, and by premium demand in China. However, after robust growth of 39% in 2013 and 29% in 2014, growth expectations are moderating at 11.8% for 2015. The slowdown is primarily driven by China, with 2015 being the first year in which Chinese market growth, currently at 2.5%, is expected to be slower than the worldwide rate. Similar to other markets such as the US, UK, Australia and Japan, smartphone vendors now have to convince Chinese consumers to upgrade their devices, which is more difficult to do than attracting first-time buyers.

Figure 2. Global smartphone sales growth is slowing

Source: Barclays as at May 2015

3. Weak results from bellwethers signal trouble for the supply chain 

Challenging dynamics in key end markets are leading to disappointing results and lower guidance across the broader supply chain in the technology sector. Notable examples include:

  • Intel lowering 2015 revenue guidance twice this year, citing weaker than expected demand for desktop PCs and increasingly challenging macroeconomic and currency conditions, particularly in Europe
  • Advanced Micro Devices pre-announcing negative 2Q15 results due to weaker than expected consumer PC demand
  • Samsung providing guidance that 2Q15 results could fall below expectations due to continued weakness in the company’s mobile and semiconductor businesses
  • Apple reporting that 2Q15 iPhone shipments were below expectations
  • Qualcomm lowering its 2015 forecast yet again due to lower than expected demand for high-end devices.

Disappointing results from such bellwether names make us cautious about the results due to be announced by other companies in the technology supply chain in the remainder  of the 2Q15 earnings season.

4. Semiconductor consolidation is accelerating 

With about $80bn in announced deals through the first five months of the year, consolidation has notably picked up in the semiconductor industry. This M&A activity is primarily being driven by the need to offset slowing top-line growth due to challenging dynamics in the key end markets of computing and wireless, and the need for scale as the costs of manufacturing chips continue to increase. Some of the recent headline deals include:

  • Intel announcing its intention to acquire Altera for $16.7bn, allowing it to expand into data servers and thereby the internet of things market
  • NXP announcing its intention to acquire Freescale for $16.7bn, creating a powerhouse in automotive chips
  • Avago acquiring Broadcom for $37bn, strengthening its position in semiconductor chips for mobile phones.

What does this mean for credit investors?

Strong operating results boosted by the PC upgrade cycle, and strong growth in smartphone sales, drove the high-yield technology sector to gain 6.8% in 2014, notably more than the 2.5% return of the broader US high-yield index . Now that these dynamics are reversing, we are more cautious on the technology space this year. We remain underweight companies with outsized exposure to the PCs or those in the handset supply chain. Instead, we prefer chipmakers that have recently strengthened their operating profiles through M&A and stand to benefit from more diversified end markets, meaningful synergies and commitments from management to pay down debt.

Share this post:
Audra Stundziaite Senior Credit Analyst Audra joined Hermes in 2015 and is a senior credit analyst covering energy and technology sectors. Prior to this, she was an analyst at CDP Capital, a New York-based investment fund that is a subsidiary of Canada-based La Caisse. Before making the move to the buyside, Audra worked at Barclays Capital in New York, where she was an Assistant Vice President in credit research. Audra graduated with a BA from the University of Pennsylvania, with a double major in Economics and International Relations.
Read all articles by Audra Stundziaite

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Amy Wilson
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Andrey Kuznetsov, CFA
  • Audra Stundziaite
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Elena Tedesco
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Gary Greenberg
  • Geir Lode
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Hamish Galpin
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Ingrid Holmes
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Kimberley Lewis
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Maxime Le Floch, CFA
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Mitch Reznick, CFA
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Patrick Marshall
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tim Goodman
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • credit