We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Hermes comments ahead of today’s WPP AGM

Home / Press Centre / Hermes comments ahead of today’s WPP AGM

08 June 2016

Ahead of today’s WPP AGM, Dr Hans-Christoph Hirt, Co-Head of Hermes EOS, comments on succession planning and executive remuneration at the firm:

1. Succession planning

Sir Martin Sorrell, WPP’s CEO and founder, has created remarkable value since setting up the company in 1985. He is rightly regarded as one of the most successful entrepreneurs and business leaders in the world.

In light of this, the preparation for his eventual succession has been the focus of our engagement over the last 18 months, following intensive dialogue with WPP on board composition and remuneration in previous years. We welcome the chair’s recognition of investor concerns regarding the company’s preparedness for succession. Succession risk appears to have moved up the company’s agenda under the chair’s leadership and management of this seems increasingly reflected in WPP’s work and communications to shareholders. The external board evaluation that was carried out in 2015/2016 was also encouraging. However, while we appreciate the steps that the company has taken so far, we urge the chair to continue to make progress on the management of succession risks and enhance disclosure on existing and planned measures.

We would like to emphasise that our engagement does not question whether Sir Martin is the right person to lead WPP but is about ensuring that the company’s succession risks are appropriately managed and that an eventual succession proceeds smoothly.

2. Executive remuneration

We recognise the company’s strong performance under the CEO’s leadership in recent years. However, in line with our vote against the remuneration report last year, we are unable to support this year’s packages. Unfortunately, even considering the strong performance and pay practices at peers, the legacy equity incentive plan introduced in 2009 (LEAP III) has once again led to what we regard as an excessive level of CEO remuneration for 2015.

We appreciate that a new remuneration policy was approved by shareholders in 2013 and that the legacy plan only has one more year to run. Nonetheless, we are highly uncomfortable with the 2015 quantum, not least in light of our historic concerns about board composition and the remuneration committee’s apparent lack of vigour and stress-testing when the legacy plan was devised.

While we acknowledge that the current chair of the remuneration committee did not conceive the legacy equity plan, we urge him to draw the right lessons from the controversy around executive pay at WPP in recent years. Only then can the trust of internal and external stakeholders in the effectiveness of WPP’s board and its remuneration committee be restored.

We will continue our engagement with WPP on succession planning and executive remuneration in the third quarter of this year ahead of a vote on a new remuneration policy in 2017.

Share this post:

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Amy Wilson
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Ingrid Holmes
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Kimberley Lewis
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Maxime Le Floch, CFA
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • eos

Press contacts