We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Economic outlook - looking into 2018

Home / Press Centre / Economic outlook – looking into 2018

Neil Williams, Senior Economic Adviser
04 December 2017
Macro Economics

In his latest quarterly Economic Outlook, Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist at Hermes Investment Management, sets out his five core macro beliefs for 2018. He argues that, in the Lunar Year of the Dog, the ‘bark’ of global central bankers may end up being far worse than their ‘bite’.

If central banks want their powder back, the Fed’s dual mandate may make sense
While 2017 was (like 2016) dominated by geopolitical risk (North Korea, alleged US/Russia links, European populism), none of that was allowed to seep into financial markets. Lubricated by cheap money, a $15trn sink of QE, and the prospect of US tax cuts, reflation trades have raised the ‘cost’ to investors of missing out, even if they lack conviction.

The frustration for central banks is that recoveries since 2009 have been mainly output driven. Unemployment is a reducing drag. Yet, with output gaps slow to close and wage pressure capped, these recoveries are failing to generate enough inflation to trigger central banks’ usual reaction functions.

This – and hopefully the realisation that prolonging liquidity injections and ultra-low rates may now be contributing to the problem – is the starting point faced by a run of new heads at the US Fed and maybe BoJ in 2018, and ECB and BoE in 2019. They will offer new lenses. Extending inflation targets or broadening them to nominal GDP have their place.

However, if central banks truly want to get their ‘powder’ back, in terms of reclaiming their policy rate while core inflation stays tame, the spirit, if not the letter, of the Fed’s dual mandate (core inflation and employment/output) may make sense for others too.

With major economies having recouped their GDP since the crisis, this may then be seen as ‘hawkish’, especially if US tax cuts go through. But, it would be more than offset if we need to brace for further political distrust, with the threat of beggar-thy-neighbour policies - from the US to an upsurge of anti-European populism - a major risk still unpriced by markets.

In which case, without care, an unhelpful jigsaw piece that prolonged the 1930s depression but was absent from the 2008 crisis - retaliatory trade protectionism - might yet come crashing into place.

Amid these forces, our macro outlook is based on five core beliefs.
First, despite ‘muscle flexing’, the road to monetary-policy normalisation will be long and slow. Real rates will stay negative, with ‘peak’ rates ending up below what we’re used to. The question is how to drain the liquidity ‘sink’ without unintended consequences.

Second, governments will offer fiscal solutions to add stimulus, try to appease electorates, and take back the ‘baton’ from central banks. With Europe still highly-charged politically though, there’ll be little sympathy for a quick, no-strings Brexit deal.

Third, should protectionist forces build, inflation will reappear. But, it will be the ‘wrong sort’ – cost, rather than demand, led. Central banks would ‘turn a blind’ eye as the inflationary flame snuffs itself out. In which case, 2018 could be a ‘year of two halves’.

Fourth, China may tighten policy but still has the tools to support growth. But, fifth, for those emerging markets with high exposure to short-term external debt and foreign saving needs, the outlook’s less rosy.

Regardless, by taking baby steps, central banks want back their powder in case economies slow again. But, this is of course circular, and they’ll be wary that going too far doesn’t cause that downturn. In which case, in the Lunar Year of the Dog, the ‘bark’ of central bankers may prove far worse than their ‘bite’.

Share this post:
Neil Williams Senior Economic Adviser Neil joined Hermes in August 2009 and is responsible for Hermes’ economic research. He has a forward-looking approach to generate investment strategy ideas. Neil adopts top-down methods – macro and market analysis to identify interest rate and credit value, and sovereign default risk. Neil began his career in 1987 at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), becoming its youngest ever Head of Economic Policy. He went on to hold a number of senior positions in investment banks - including Director of Bond Research at UBS, Head of Research at Sumitomo International, Global Head of Emerging Markets Research at PaineWebber International, and, before coming to Hermes, Head of Sovereign Research and Strategy at Mizuho International. Neil has 30 years’ industry experience and earned an MA in Economics in 1986 from Manchester University, having the previous year completed his BSc (Hons), also in Economics, from University College Swansea.
Read all articles by Neil Williams

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Amy Wilson
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Kimberley Lewis
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Maxime Le Floch, CFA
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • macro economics

Press contacts