We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Is China in crisis?

Home / Press Centre / Is China in crisis?

05 November 2015
Macro Economics

In his latest Ahead of the Curve, Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist at Hermes Investment Management, assesses the macroeconomic outlook in China.

Despite China’s slowdown, global growth should not be completely derailed. But, it is a headwind, with the pressure to preserve world growth now tilting back from the emerging to advanced economies.

After 3.4% yoy world growth in 2014, the IMF now expects 3.1% in 2015, and only a shallow uplift to 3.8% yoy by 2017. If it is right, this 3.1% stands to be the lowest since 2009, when China was officially growing 9% yoy. At about 2% yoy, the gap this year between the advanced and emerging economies’ growth rates is likely to be the smallest since the boom in 2000.

China is slowing from a high peak and can soften the landing...

Yet, as the chart below reminds us, China’s slowdown - even to a more realistic 3% growth scenario - starts from a very high base. This is relative to both the G7, and other BRIC economies.

Admittedly risks remain. If the usual lags hold, the deceleration in money-growth engineered by The People’s Bank of China (PBoC) after 2010 suggests another nine months before China’s ‘coincident indicator’ (used to detect turning points) picks up.

Alternative measures suggest official growth is overstated. Suspicion understandably falls on China’s speedy compilation of GDP data: the G8’s fastest. Released within three weeks of the pertaining quarter, they are barely revised, and consistently close to target. For 2015, the target is “close to 7%”, with Premier Li inferring a minimum +6.5% per annum needed to 2020.

Alternative measures suggest a dislocation since 2012 from the official growth target to a ‘true’ rate closer to 3% yoy.

And two unknowns are now the extent to which leverage behind China’s equity positions dents activity, possibly via real estate; and the deflationary flow - via falling commodity prices, lower Asian exchange rates, and cheaper exports – to the G7.

China has an array of policy ‘buttons’ to press. But it must act...

While wary of the risks, we take comfort that China still has an array of policy ‘buttons’ to press to soften the landing. But, it needs to act.

First, on the monetary front, real lending rates of 4% and 15.5%-18% reserve requirement ratios (RRR) for banks are still punitive, and can be cut more aggressively. When taken in tandem, such as in 2010-12, these changes do impact China’s activity.

Second, with August-September’s $137bn reserve outflow clearly unsustainable, further renminbi devaluations will be used as a pressure release. Non-deliverable forwards suggest only -5.5% over two years, which looks modest. Further intervention would raise questions about China’s commitment to US Treasuries. So, a one-off devaluation may be preferable to a constant ‘drip-feed’.

Then there’s fiscal policy. With the 2014 budget deficit officially reported at just 1.8% of GDP (which would make it the G8’s third lowest), there’s ample scope for largesse. Expect more stimuli ranging from agricultural subsidies and infrastructure spending (each traditionally used to hit growth targets), direct lending to preferred sectors such as agriculture and SMEs, and ad hoc liquidity injections.

And, should domestic debt strains build, China could run QE. Admittedly more troublesome might be dealing with what could be up to $1trn of corporate and bank foreign-currency debt. Isolated defaults are possible – but the PBoC would surely delve into its still massive $ 3½trn foreign exchange reserves to avoid something more systemic.

Handing over the growth baton...

For some, the ‘triple whammy’ of China devaluation, US rate hike, and European weakness will revive memories of 1994 when most assets were hit hard. But that was a different time. China’s devaluation was huge, based more on reform than growth, and pressured Asian sovereigns to whittle away reserves to protect their own currency pegs.

The only meaningful peg now is Hong Kong’s, which should benefit from a weaker renminbi, given half its imports are from the Mainland.

Meanwhile, the baton looks like it’s being handed back to the advanced economies to fuel world growth. This means accelerating QE in Japan, the euro-zone and Sweden, rate cuts in others (e.g. Australia, New Zealand, Norway) and competitive currency falls, while China enacts an avalanche of stimulus measures sufficient to arrest the decline and avert market turmoil.

If it doesn’t, the Fed’s rate tightening cycle could prove to be one of the shortest yet.

img aoc

Share this post:

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Amy Wilson
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Ingrid Holmes
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Kimberley Lewis
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Maxime Le Floch, CFA
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • macro economics

Press contacts