CLOSE

We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website https://www.hermes-investment.com, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2016, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept
CLOSE

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

Proceed

The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Siemens – Taking action on governance and strategy

Case study

Home / Hermes EOS Case Studies / Siemens – Taking action on governance and strategy

Hans-Christoph Hirt,
17 November 2015
Governance

Our engagement with Siemens has been longstanding and constructive, with the company as a rule receptive to our input on the management of its compliance crisis, refreshment of its supervisory board in 2008 and overhaul of its management and supervisory board remuneration systems. In recent years, our focus has been on succession of the chair and the effective implementation of the company’s strategy, with a focus on portfolio optimisation and strengthening project management.

What we did
At the 2014 AGM, we raised strong concerns about the composition and work of the supervisory board on behalf of our clients and a group of institutional investors from around the world, following intensive private engagement with Siemens at all levels, including the chair. We questioned the ability of the supervisory board to challenge and support the management board on key strategic issues. Our criticism was primarily directed at the CEO change in 2013, which appeared ill-prepared and poorly executed. It also related to the implicit understanding of major shareholders in the company that the chair would not serve a full term following his re-election for a third term in 2013.

Results
The company has reacted decisively to our criticism at the AGM in 2014, which was shared by the largest German institutional investors. It carried out an externally facilitated board evaluation, revamped a key committee and proposed to replace two supervisory board members at the 2015 AGM – three years prior to the expiry of their mandates.

The replacement of two members of the supervisory board at the 2015 AGM, following another change to its composition in late 2013, is remarkable, given that all 10 shareholder representatives were elected for five year terms in January 2013. Even though the chair now seems likely to stay until 2018, we are pleased with the progress we have seen since the 2014 AGM, as the supervisory board’s technology and innovation experience and skills have been significantly strengthened by its new members. Although one of the candidates elected at the 2015 AGM highlighted that he is not available to take over from the current chair due to the board’s refreshment since late 2013, there now appear to be potential successors for the chair.

At the 2015 AGM, we welcomed the progress the company has made in refreshing its supervisory board while seeking more detailed information about its board evaluation. We also challenged the new strategy and the acquisition of US company Dresser-Rand. Furthermore, we urged the management board to focus on executing the portfolio optimisation plan and strengthening project management.

We will concentrate on both topics in our future engagement with the company.

 

Share this post:
Hans-Christoph Hirt Dr Hans-Christoph Hirt is an executive director and board member at Hermes EOS and as Co-Head of the organisation responsible for the sustainable success of the business. He leads and oversees the global engagement programme and the quality of the services Hermes EOS provides to its clients around the world. Hans also leads some high-profile stewardship activities, including priority engagements with major companies in Asia and Germany, as well as interactions with key regulators and organisations. rnrnPrior to joining Hermes EOS, Hans worked with international law firm Ashurst. He is the author of numerous publications on corporate governance and law, responsible investment and stewardship. Currently, he is a member of the Steering Committee of the UN PRI Investor Engagement Clearinghouse and the Shareholder Responsibilities Committee of the International Corporate Governance Network. In 2015, he joined the Institutional Investor Council in Malaysia. Hans is a UK-qualified lawyer, holds degrees in Business Administration from universities in Germany and the UK, the ACCA qualification and a PhD from the London School of Economics (LSE). He continues to be involved in academia as a Corporate Governance Fellow at the LSE’s Financial Markets Group and a Teaching Fellow at University College London. Hans speaks French, German and Mandarin.
Read all articles by Hans-Christoph Hirt

Hermes EOS Contacts