CLOSE

We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website https://www.hermes-investment.com, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2016, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept
CLOSE

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

Proceed

The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

The benefits of engagement for passive investors

Home / Hermes EOS Blog / The benefits of engagement for passive investors

iStock_000005419257Large-e1426872039766

The passive investor by his or her very nature is an owner – not a trader – of the companies he invests in. Selling out of a poorly performing company is not an option. Depending on the index he is tracking, the passive investor will be widely invested – typically in hundreds, if not thousands of companies – and therefore is also interested in the long-term sustainability of the wider economy in which he participates. This goes beyond the direct value of the companies he invests in to so-called externalities such as pollution and bribery and corruption which can detrimentally impact the functioning of the real economy.

Value add

Based on its 10-year experience of engagement, Hermes EOS knows that shareholder engagement with policy-makers and companies provides the passive investor with an effective tool to add value and manage risk in the companies he owns. It also allows the passive investor to meet his fiduciary responsibilities and become an active owner of public and private companies. Depending on the ethos of the passive investor or those of his clients, by acting as a responsible steward of investee companies, engagement also helps to safeguard a fund’s reputation and further the broader aims of its beneficiaries.

Public policy engagements

Public policy engagement seeks to reduce environmental, social and governance (ESG) risk in the economy as a whole by improving standards across a country, sector or globally. Just a few examples of public policy engagement we have participated in and continue to contribute to include

▪ the development of a corporate governance code in Japan

▪ the introduction of a global carbon price, working with stock exchanges around the world to require company disclosure of ESG metrics

▪ boosting the protection of minority shareholder rights in Brazil

▪ the introduction of stewardship codes in Japan and Malaysia, and

▪ setting a professional code of conduct for bankers in the UK.

The value of successful public policy engagements can be broken down into two main categories: Firstly, a lower cost of capital from the reduced risk in investments in a sector, country or globally. Secondly, successful engagement may correct an externality, in other words a cost not currently borne by direct investments but one that will be carried by the economy as a whole and therefore ultimately by the passive investor.

Corporate engagements

The goal of corporate engagement is to achieve beneficial change relating to risk management and value creation. The basic premise is that companies with informed and involved shareholders are more likely to achieve superior long-term performance than those without. Indeed, a Hermes Investment Management paper “Does it just make you feel good, or is it actually good for your portfolio?” from January 2014 shows that over the last five years well-governed companies tended to outperform poorly governed companies by over 30 basis points per month. Engagement with companies can be on any material issue where there is a significant misalignment between the company’s actions and the interests of long-term shareholders. These typically include concerns such as board composition, executive remuneration, carbon exposure, water stress, supply chain, labour rights, bribery and corruption, conduct, risk management, culture, capital allocation and business strategy.

Relationships matter

Hermes EOS takes a holistic approach to company engagement – addressing all engagement issues, including social and environmental, in the context of the business strategy and performance – as our track record demonstrates that this is most likely to achieve credibility with management and yield positive results. In addition, key to effective company engagement is for the investor to build a strong long-term relationship of trust with the company, while at the same time holding the board accountable for its actions. Constructively working with boards and management in private is the most effective way of achieving positive change. Where no progress is made over an extended time period, however, Hermes EOS will use the press and other public forums to drive change, typically by speaking at AGMs or EGMs, or by filing shareholder resolutions.

An example: engaging with banks

The value of corporate engagement to a passive investor is not simply about making well-performing companies less risky. It is also about reducing the value destruction of the poor performing company which the passive investor is unable to sell and therefore mitigate losses as a responsible owner. For example, significant value destruction in banks occurred following the financial crisis. Acting on behalf of the owners of the banks and also recognising the importance for the proper functioning of the wider economy, Hermes EOS has been engaging with banks globally on board composition, conduct and culture, executive remuneration and business portfolio strategy to ensure that shareholders achieve a sustainable economic return from their bank investments and that the likelihood of a repeat of the crisis is minimised. While progress has been made with positive changes to the balance of power on boards, greater business focus on economically viable business units and the espousal of more responsible conduct, a lot still remains to do on the implementation of cultural change, executive remuneration and the delivery of sustainable economic returns.

Share this post:
Leon Kamhi – Head of Responsibility at Hermes investment Management Reporting into Hermes Investment Management’s CEO, Leon Kamhi is responsible for developing and directing the programme for integrating responsibility across the Hermes group, overseeing its delivery and accountable for its success. This includes ensuring investment teams are aware of and integrate ESG performance in investment decisions and that engagement is effectively incorporated alongside investment activities. In addition, in this role he oversees and contributes to how the firm’s responsibility activities and performance are integrated into Hermes’ client relationship management and reporting, the delivery of its corporate citizenship programme and the development of responsible structures and processes for the firm. He also leads a number of corporate and public policy engagements. Previously at Hermes, Leon was responsible for the development and delivery of Hermes EOS’ global corporate and public policy engagement programme from 2012-2016 and acted as its commercial director from 2009-2012. Prior to that, Leon worked within the Hermes UK Large Cap Focus Fund for seven years, where he was responsible for executing the fund’s engagement programmes. He also has 12 years of strategy consulting and operational industry experience.
Read all articles by Leon Kamhi – Head of Responsibility at Hermes investment Management

Find posts by author

  • Bill Mackenzie
  • Bruce Duguid
  • Christine Chow
  • Colin Melvin – Global Head of Stewardship
  • Darren Brady
  • Dominic Burke
  • Emma Hunt
  • Freddie Woolfe
  • Hans-Christoph Hirt
  • Jaime Gornsztejn
  • Jennifer Walmsley
  • Jon Brager
  • Karin Ri
  • Leon Kamhi – Head of Responsibility at Hermes investment Management
  • Louise Dudley
  • Lui Goldie
  • Mais Hayek
  • Manuel Isaza
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martina Macpherson
  • Matthew Doyle
  • Maxine Wille
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Viehs
  • Naheeda Rashid
  • Natacha Dimitrijevic
  • Nina Rehrbein
  • Rochelle Giugni
  • Roland Bosch
  • Sachi Suzuki
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Goodman
  • Victoria Barron

Find posts by category

  • Select category
  • environment
  • governance
  • social
  • strategy