We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2016, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Deutsche Bank AGM

Home / EOS Press / Deutsche Bank AGM

20 May 2015

Ahead of Deutsche Bank’s AGM in Frankfurt on 21 May 2015, Dr Hans-Christoph Hirt, Director, explains why Hermes EOS will not approve the actions of the management board.

Hermes EOS, on behalf of the institutional investors it represents, will vote against the so-called discharge of the members of Deutsche Bank’s management board. With this vote we formally express our strong concerns about a range of issues and our lack of confidence in the management board.

We urge the bank’s supervisory board to review the composition of the management board, taking its performance over the last three years and its new strategy into account.

Concerns about the management board

Hermes EOS has previously raised concerns with Deutsche Bank about its progress on culture change, dealing with pending litigation and investigations and the delivery of targets set under its Strategy 2015+, which the bank launched in September 2012.

We have previously queried with the bank itself the suitability of Juergen Fitschen and Anshu Jain, the bank’s two chief executives, to lead Deutsche’s culture change, given their long tenure in key leadership positions including at the Investment Bank.

In our opinion, the development of Deutsche’s share price and the total shareholder return since Fitschen and Jain took over three years ago seem to reflect the failure of Strategy 2015+.

Valuable time and credibility has been lost by the management board’s late recognition that changes to the bank’s structure and business model are required to sustainably create value in a changed regulatory environment. In April 2015, Deutsche Bank announced the next phase in its strategy, Strategy 2020, but has not yet provided enough details to allow investors a robust assessment of the new plan.

Settlements of interbank offered rates (IBOR) investigations with US and UK regulators

Hermes EOS and its clients are very concerned about the findings of US and UK regulators which were published when Deutsche settled investigations into its involvement in the rigging of IBOR on 23 April 2015 by paying around $2.5 billion in fines and disgorgements.

The statements by key regulators involved indicate, in our view, that the levels of the fines reflect both the severity of the misconduct of Deutsche’s employees but also the bank’s slow response to the investigations and inadequate cooperation. The management board bears ultimate responsibility for the apparent defects and delays in responding to the investigations and thus the increased fines.

Background: Hermes EOS engagement with Deutsche since 2009

Hermes EOS has had an intensive engagement with Deutsche on behalf of its clients since 2009, involving dialogue with senior executives and members of the management and supervisory boards, filing of a shareholder proposal in 2012 and speeches at the AGMs in 2012 and 2013.

Our shareholder proposal in 2012 raising concerns about the amount of pending litigation and investigations and corporate culture was supported by more than 20% of the shareholders voting at the AGM and contributed to more focus on the creation of a sustainable business.

Share this post:

Find posts by author

Find posts by category

  • Select category
  • uncategorised

Press contacts