We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie notices.

Can Brazil’s golden glow linger?

Gary Greenberg

Head of Emerging Markets and Lead Portfolio Manager

Home / Perspectives / Can Brazil’s golden glow linger?

Gary Greenberg, Head of Hermes Emerging Markets
24 August 2016
Emerging Markets

Brazil is enjoying a bull market, based on hopes that the rising level of sovereign debt could stabilise, and even begin to reverse. These hopes have been piqued by a series of dramatic political reforms, which are currently underway. However, as is common in Brazilian politics, longevity cannot be guaranteed. While the Olympics has stolen the limelight in Brazil, fiscal and monetary policy leave us cautiously optimistic that the golden glow could outlast the games.

The next few months are critical on the political front for Brazil. The Senate will give its verdict on former President Dilma Rousseff early in September. If this goes as expected, with Dilma definitively departing the presidency, the Fiscal Ceiling Amendment will be tabled by October. This amendment would cap government salary adjustments at inflation and reform social security more broadly, de-linking pension payments from the minimum wage and extending retirement ages. However, these reforms would not survive extensive popular debate, prompting Brazil’s interim President Michel Temer to attempt to pass them through political wheeling and dealing in the style of Frank Underwood from House of Cards, rather than through anything resembling a referendum. Neglecting to marshal support for austerity measures is a shaky foundation for long-term policy.

Municipal elections scheduled for October will add to the excitement and could increase the government’s political capital. Depending on conditions, the Banco Central do Brasil could start to cut interest rates, providing desperately needed relief to highly indebted consumers and businesses. If the economy recovers as a result of lower rates and greater confidence, the population will tolerate these reforms – until the next cycle or shock, at which point a change in government could herald their unwinding.


Whether the confidence induced by the current direction of policy is sufficient to sustain a recovery is unclear. Most observers cite the need for a substantially lower cost of capital to spark fresh investments, although the carry trade attracts capital at the sovereign level. The cost of capital at the corporate level may not decline as much as the market believes. The central bank is widely expected to cut the SELIC (reference) rate from 14.25% to about 12.00%, but part of the reforms involve replacing loans from the National Development Bank (BNDES) at 6% with bank loans at a several percentage point spread over the SELIC. Borrowing costs for corporates are likely to rise to about 14% for the best companies, much higher than the current subsidised cost.

A higher cost of debt means a higher cost of capital, all else being equal. Of course, subsidies ultimately come from borrowed government money and so getting rid of them will make the sovereign balance sheet healthier. This could translate to lower real rates, a stronger currency, a lower risk free rate and a lower cost of equity, plus the potential for more cuts in the SELIC rate, a promising scenario that has a lot of traction in the market at present.

However, there are political risks which could prevent this outcome. These include Interim President Temer being implicated in a lava jato or a similar scandal, former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva gaining enough strength to contest the presidential election in 2018, or Finance Minister Henrique Meirelles stepping down, having decided that the political class lacks the will to implement necessary reforms. If any of these occur, all bets are off. The CDS on government debt, currently at 300, could rise to 400 rapidly, there could be a 10% move in the real, and a 20% drop in the stock market.

The key factor in Brazil’s economic recovery remains stabilising its sovereign debt. Temer has put a good economic team in place and the economy appears to have reached a trough. In reality, Brazil has the potential to grow at about 2% each year in real terms. But the economic team's job is made easier by the global liquidity environment as investors continue to reach for Brazil's real 6% yield on government debt. Locals are hopeful that the political departments will deliver what the economics department requires.

The central bank is expected to start cutting rates in October and we estimate that it has room to ease between 2%-3%. If the currency stays strong, which is possible due to the carry trade and a smallish current account deficit of 1.5%, it may not stop at a 3% cut in order to keep the currency from significantly strengthening. Some local infrastructure investors are talking about real rates in Brazil reaching 2% in the next three-to-five years. This is different to the central bank’s preferred strategy, which is to cut slowly, keeping the curve inverted and anchoring long-term rates, but pressure to cut substantially to provide economic relief will be intense. Given global (and domestic) uncertainties, the direction of travel is subject to change at any time.

An improvement in the country’s sovereign balance sheet, a strengthening currency and positive action by the central bank should all aid a broader economic recovery in Brazil. Yet, although there appears to be strong policy support for Brazil’s economy, the nature of the country’s politics means this is never guaranteed in the long term, leaving any recovery unstable.

Share this post:
Gary Greenberg Head of Hermes Emerging Markets Gary Greenberg joined Hermes in September 2010 in the Emerging Markets team. Previous to this, he was Managing Partner at Silkstone Capital and Muse Capital, both London-based hedge funds he co-founded and managed in 2007 and 2002, respectively. From 1999 through 2002 he was Executive Director at Goldman Sachs in New York and London, where he co-headed the Emerging Markets product for GSAM, and served on the global asset allocation and European stock selection committees. From 1998 to 1999 he was Managing Director at Van Eck Global in Hong Kong and New York, where he was the lead portfolio manager for International Equities and ran the Hong Kong Office. From 1994 through 1998 Gary was Chief Investment Officer at Peregrine Asset Management in Hong Kong, managing and supervising global and regional equity, plus fixed income funds. In the early years of his career he was a Principal of Wanger Asset Management in Chicago, where he co-founded and co-managed the Acorn International Fund, which grew to $1.4 billion under his tenure. Gary holds an MBA from Thunderbird School, a BA from Carleton College and is a CFA charterholder. In 2017 Hermes Global Emerging Markets was named best emerging markets fund for the second year in a row at the Fund Manager of the Year Awards and best emerging markets group by Citywire Deutschland, and Gary was named best manager for emerging markets equity by Citywire UK.
Read all articles by Gary Greenberg

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Andrey Kuznetsov, CFA
  • Audra Stundziaite
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Elena Tedesco
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Gary Greenberg
  • Geir Lode
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Hamish Galpin
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Mitch Reznick, CFA
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Patrick Marshall
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tim Goodman
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • emerging markets