We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Why picking the right security is as important as choosing the company

Home / Press Centre / Why picking the right security is as important as choosing the company

17 November 2015

Fraser Lundie, Co-head of Credit at Hermes Investment Management, explains why security selection is a crucial element of his investment approach.

We look at credit in a different way to the majority of our peer group. Within the credit world, there is a sense that if you get the company right and avoid default you will have done your job as a bond investor. While this is a neat premise, we believe it is a gross oversimplification of the asset class.

By only focusing on the quality of a company you have only dealt with the equity risk – not the fixed income risk. You haven’t tackled convexity, duration, illiquidity or volatility by getting the company right.

For us, it is crucial to drill down deeper and get the security right within the company. Hence, we will do our bottom-up analysis like everybody else, but as important for us is - what is the most appropriate risk-adjusted way of accessing that company’s risk? Is it through bonds, loan or CDS. Is it through dollars, euros or sterling? Is it through 3-year, ten-year or 30-year issues? By emphasizing this part of the decision making process, we think investors can mitigate the fixed income risk attached to the company.

For example, if we look at the gold sector, we prefer issuers that are positioned lower on the cost curve, are less exposed to geopolitical risk and have demonstrated a strong track record amid lower gold prices. Taking these factors into account, we believe Barrick Gold is the most attractive opportunity in the sector.

However, when we analyse a company, we like to apply a different lens and look at the capital structure from a bondholder’s perspective. In the case of Barrick Gold, it is attractive due to its liquid capital structure which includes a CDS contract. We think that shorter maturities are expensive, given the market expectation that they will be redeemed at some point in near future. The very long end looks expensive as well. So instead we like CDS due to the limited debt owing between now and the current five-year CDS expiry date, and Barrick’s strategy to buyback short-end bonds to lower interest expense and gross debt.

Furthermore, Barrick has engaged in activities which favour bondholders over shareholders, a tendency which should prove helpful in preserving value for lenders in volatile times: it has a history of raising equity, tendering for bonds and selling assets to reduce debt.

Taking this approach requires a wide mandate. The reality is that many portfolios do not allow the breadth of flexibility required if an investor wants to find different ways of accessing the capital structure. It also means having the ability to invest across geographies and across the yield curve. It is this unconstrained and flexible philosophy that we employ across our absolute return, global high yield and multi strategy credit vehicles.

The need for flexibility is vital at a time where a lot of money is trapped in narrow mandates. This is exacerbated by our point in history: a post-financial crisis world where valuation and liquidity have had profound structural changes. We now live in world where so much of mispricing in credit is down to other people’s inflexibility: the relative value between loans and bonds or CDS and bonds, or euros and dollars, or between Europe and US.

When you ask deeper questions you often find you need unforeseen flexibility. We have always believed in unconstrained investing and don’t believe you can optimise fixed income credit investing by taking a narrow approach.

The above information does not constitute a solicitation or offer to any person to buy or sell any related securities or financial instruments. Stock names were chosen for illustrative purposes and are in no way a recommendation to purchase. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

Share this post:

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Amy Wilson
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Ingrid Holmes
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • credit

Press contacts