Search this website. You can use fund codes to locate specific funds

Climate responsibility and going beyond net-zero

In January, Microsoft announced two ambitious goals to help tackle the climate crisis. By 2030 it aims to be carbon negative, and by 2050 it will remove from the environment all the carbon the company has emitted either directly or by electrical consumption since it was founded in 1975.

Within EOS at Federated Hermes, we have devoted significant resource to engaging on the climate crisis, particularly in the last few years, as our clients have made it clear they see it as the most important issue for our engagement.

Many companies have begun to take action to reduce their own emissions and to explain how they plan to manage the risks and opportunities that climate change poses to their businesses.

However, the urgency of the climate emergency requires companies to do more. Inevitably, we and long-term investors have focused our efforts on the suppliers of fossil fuels and the largest greenhouse gas emitters. However, for the energy transition to be as smooth as possible, investors also need to address the demand for energy.

Business as usual now requires a climate dimension, which means reducing energy use and committing to net-zero emissions, including within the company’s value chain, as soon as possible. Often this will be easier for less energy-intensive businesses and so these should be at the forefront of such efforts.

We recently congratulated Microsoft on its ground-breaking commitment not only to aim for net-zero but also to remove from the atmosphere all the greenhouse gases that it has ever released. We acknowledge that this is easier for Microsoft than for many other companies, but we should applaud leaders and encourage others to follow their lead. By doing this, we help to create a business environment where climate responsibility is the new normal. We can no longer wait for the more timid companies to make up their minds on climate: bold action is needed, and Microsoft has shown that it is possible.

We note that some Microsoft employees and other stakeholders are concerned that the company continues to offer its cloud and other services to the oil and gas industry. We think that the positive action indicated by the recent announcement is a more effective way to combat climate change. However, we acknowledge that if urgent action is not taken across the global economy to combat climate change, these calls will understandably grow louder. We urge other companies to follow Microsoft’s lead to minimise the disorderliness of the energy transition.

Related Insights

Cryptocurrency – the good, the bad and the ugly
Investors should engage with companies to understand the risks associated with cryptocurrencies.
China’s long and winding road to net zero
We are engaging with Chinese and Hong Kong companies on establishing targets and plans for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in line with the Paris Agreement.
Japan Tobacco case study
Japan Tobacco has demonstrated its commitment to eliminating child labour from its supply chain through various programmes and significantly improving its reporting on the issue, including a standalone human rights report.
POSCO case study
Following engagement on climate change, POSCO strengthened its governance and management framework of climate-related issues.
Associated British Foods case study
ABF has evaluated its approach to risk management and subsequently provided increased assurance to investors and increased its communication on the topic.
JD.com case study
JD.com published its first ESG report in April 2021 and its second sustainability report in June 2021. It also held its first shareholder meeting in June 2021 with appointment of its first female board director.

EOS Client Service and Business Development

Amy D’Eugenio,
Head of Client Service and Business Development, EOS