We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Time to open the other tool box?

Home / Press Centre / Time to open the other tool box?

Neil Williams, Senior Economic Adviser
07 June 2016
Macro Economics

Financial markets have calmed since the spring. However, according to Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist at Hermes Investment Management in his latest Economic Outlook, with macro recoveries and corporate earnings below par and vulnerable, central banks daren’t remove the tide of liquidity covering the sharp rocks beneath. After seven years, though, their monetary tool boxes look bare.

The Fed having raised rates once is the test-case for whether central banks can ever ‘normalise’ monetary policy. We expect it to try, hiking twice more, but peaking out early at just 1%. This suggests another two years of negative real rates in the US and UK.

Slower-growth economies may as well relax fiscally - given QE is already capping their bond yields...

Deflation-prone Japan and the eurozone can’t be sure of that. The eurozone is halfway down the Japan route. It too may be accelerating QE and running negative rates, but has yet to loosen the fiscal reins. Its sharp deficit reduction, though, suggests it can.

‘Helicopter money’ is considered a next step. The absence of a eurozone-wide fiscal agency precludes a unified giveaway akin to the US tax-rebate cheques. But it could still be done nationally, with reform back-end-loaded to allow growth and protect ratings.

EU exit fears could extend beyond June and beyond the UK...

A complication is the UK referendum. Brexit can still be avoided, but exit-fears could extend beyond June and the UK. With the EU’s relative safe haven status questioned (and as the ECB runs QE), this could benefit the US dollar - putting an extra, early brake on the Fed’s normalisation.

And with general elections due next year in France, Germany, and potentially Italy and The Netherlands, they may have little sympathy for a quick, ‘no-strings’ UK deal. The (next) UK Chancellor may yet have to forego returning to budget surplus by 2019/20.

China’s dilemma is to cut borrowing costs while property transactions outpace new building starts by about two-to-one. There too, the result is probably fiscal expansion. The big macro risk is a policy face-off between US rate hikes and renminbi devaluations.

In the meantime, central banks seem hell-bent on QE, despite its patchy success in lifting inflation. As we know from Japan, the main benefit is to keep bond yields down for longer - as others now attest. (Please see chart below.)

In which case, with growth under threat, funding costs low/negative, and infrastructure needs high, it surely makes sense for stubbornly slow-growth Europe and Japan to relax fiscally – using the aggressive QE they’re doing anyway to cap any subsequent rise in bond yields.

Japanification – is Japan leading the way on QE?

Shows 10-year JGB yield, vs 10-year German Bund yield lagged 15 years (both %)


Share this post:
Neil Williams Senior Economic Adviser Neil joined Hermes in August 2009 and is responsible for Hermes’ economic research. He has a forward-looking approach to generate investment strategy ideas. Neil adopts top-down methods – macro and market analysis to identify interest rate and credit value, and sovereign default risk. Neil began his career in 1987 at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), becoming its youngest ever Head of Economic Policy. He went on to hold a number of senior positions in investment banks - including Director of Bond Research at UBS, Head of Research at Sumitomo International, Global Head of Emerging Markets Research at PaineWebber International, and, before coming to Hermes, Head of Sovereign Research and Strategy at Mizuho International. Neil has 30 years’ industry experience and earned an MA in Economics in 1986 from Manchester University, having the previous year completed his BSc (Hons), also in Economics, from University College Swansea.
Read all articles by Neil Williams

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ingrid Holmes
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso

Find posts by category

  • macro economics

Press contacts