We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie notices.

16 European banks in 16 days

Home / Perspectives / 16 European banks in 16 days

Filippo Alloatti, Senior Credit Analyst
26 May 2015

Capital, revenue and bad legacy loans

European banks continue to accumulate capital while reducing leverage. Such progress, combined with the growth of deposit bases, should help compress spreads on their debt. However, banks are finding it difficult to generate revenue through traditional lending practices to compensate for declining net interest margins, forcing management teams to pay close attention to the overheads of their extensive branch networks and higher compliance and consumer protection costs. In an environment where generating revenues is still tough, cost control is also necessary.

The large stock of non-performing loans (NPLs) – Italian banks hold €350bn and Spanish lenders have €211bn, for instance – remains problematic but could become less worrisome amid a strengthening cyclical recovery and higher GDP growth in real and nominal terms – as long as deflation is kept at bay. It is important that banks work faster to resolve these bad loans, as these assets require large capital backstops and, for this reason, partially explain the absence of new lending in the economic recovery.

The banks’ need to hold capital against NPLs and the difficulty of generating revenue also makes it challenging for them to match the cost of equity, even though it has declined slightly.

Interest rates and proposed regulation

The movement of interest rates is clearly another important consideration. Higher rates, coupled with a steeper yield curve, could in time translate into better net interest margins for banks. On the flipside, persistently low rates would put pressure on banks to re-think their business models and consider other lines of business, such as asset management, as revenues from loans remain subdued.

More broadly, three consequences of the global financial crisis will continue to influence the environment in which banks do business: overhanging public and private debt, low levels of investment by companies and high unemployment in peripheral European Union countries.

While the jury is still out on the impact of the European Central Bank’s quantitative easing programme, the cost of equity, as mentioned previously, is declining. Proposed regulations from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervisions (BCBS), dubbed Basel IV, seems to support the use of simple standardised models instead of banks’ internal methods to calculate capital requirements. A consequence of this may be an increase in risk-weighted assets. The Fundamental Review of the Trading Book, another BCBS consultation, could have a similar impact on investment banks.

Share this post:
Filippo Alloatti Senior Credit Analyst Filippo joined Hermes in 2011 as a senior credit analyst on the Hermes Credit team and specialises in global financials. Prior to this he served in a similar capacity at Fortis Investments in the global credit and hybrids group and subsequently at BNP Paribas Asset Management in Paris. Other roles at Fortis included securitisation analyst and regulated utilities and property analyst. Filippo began his career in Germany at Sal Oppenheim & Cie and Berenberg Bank, where he was responsible for derivatives trading and M&A financing. Filippo holds a Bachelor’s degree in Economics & Business Administration from the Universita’ La Sapienza in Rome.
Read all articles by Filippo Alloatti

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Parry
  • Andrey Kuznetsov, CFA
  • Audra Stundziaite
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Elena Tedesco
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Gary Greenberg
  • Geir Lode
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Hamish Galpin
  • Harriet Steel
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Mitch Reznick, CFA
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Patrick Marshall
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tim Goodman
  • Tommaso Mancuso

Find posts by category

  • credit