We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie notices.

Adapting to the BoE's corporate-bond buying programme

Investment Commentary

Hermes Credit

Home / Perspectives / Adapting to the BoE’s corporate-bond buying programme

Mitch Reznick, CFA, Co-Head of Credit and Head of Credit Research
03 October 2016

The Bank of England’s corporate bond-buying programme follows the path of its European counterpart’s initiative. The short-term impact on credit-market performance has been remarkable, although risks still lurk for those investors who indiscriminately run to yield.

New buyer on the block

In early September, the Bank of England (BoE) will launch the Corporate Bond Purchase Scheme (CBPS) as one tool in a set designed to mitigate economic pressure that could follow the decision of a small majority of British voters to quit the European Union. Through the scheme, the BoE intends to purchase up to £10bn in corporate bonds of non-financial companies with at least one investment-grade rating, over a period of 18 months. In its own words, the purpose of the CBPS is to “impart monetary stimulus by lowering the yields on corporate bonds, thereby reducing the cost of borrowing for companies”.

This, in turn, should stimulate new issuance of corporate bonds. And while the announcement of the programme surprised many, the European Central Bank (ECB) had blazed the trail only a few months before with its Corporate Sector Purchase Programme (CSPP), so the swift tightening of sterling credit spreads and flattening of credit curves was like déjà vu all over again (see chart below). In addition, look at credit curves across Europe: much of the front end of corporate credit is trading at negative levels. Following this distortion in valuations, as credit investors we must now decide whether or not we are being paid for the risks inherent in corporate fundamentals, ESG exposure and Brexit, with yields now much lower.

Tighter spreads, lower yields as central bank intervention distorts valuations



Source: Bloomberg as at 22 August 2016

Gauging the impact

First, let's take a look at the impact on credit markets. At £10bn in size, the scheme could absorb approximately 8% of the available credit pool. While this is smaller in scale than the CSPP, which represents approximately 11% of the eligible euro credit market, the CBPS could be more influential because the sterling credit market is shallower and thus less liquid. Meantime, with the front end of investment-grade credit curves now firmly in negative-yield territory (see chart below), pension schemes and insurance companies are required to move further down the credit curve to find yields that meet their needs.

Negative yields at the front of the curve



Source: Bloomberg as at 22 August 2016

Indeed, at the confluence of this hunt for yield and the ability for companies to lock in long-term debt financing at historic lows, we are seeing UK corporates issue long-term debt. Take Vodafone for example. Days before the CBPS announcement, Vodafone issued an £800m bond with a maturity of 2049 and coupon of 3.375% at a credit spread of 190bps over gilts. Less than a week later, after the CBPS announcement and having seen that bond surge eight points in price, it was able to issue an even larger bond at £1bn in size and longer in maturity at 2056 – with a lower coupon of 3% and at a much lower credit spread over gilts of 168bps.

Overvaluations and opportunities

Meantime, because nothing happens in a vacuum, the indirect impact of the scheme has been palpable across debt markets. For example, ‘out-of-scope’ securities have benefited immensely (but not evenly) from the imminent programme. Whereas lower quality high-yield names such as Matalan are trading approximately where they were before the referendum, higher quality names like Virgin Media and Travis Perkins are trading at or above their pre-Brexit levels. Standard Chartered, which is out-of-scope as a banking institution, issued a dollar-denominated additional tier 1 bond that attracted large demand from investors and had the largest order book for such a transaction from a European lender so far this year.

The siren call for yield persists. As a result, valuations in some areas have traded beyond what we perceive as fair value for the fundamental, ESG and Brexit-related risks of companies. That said, the exogenous catalysts of the BoE and ECB programmes will endure. We are finding opportunities at the long ends of credit curves, in other jurisdictions – hard-currency emerging-market debt and the US – and among the capital securities of higher quality companies. Additionally, in the high-yield market, our focus on up-in-quality trades remains and we are avoiding stressed names that are illiquid or require more supportive macro environments to grow into their capital structures. We believe that declining recovery values, as evidenced by the defaults of Oi and Abengoa, imply that downside scenarios will be more malignant than in the past.

Share this post:
Mitch Reznick, CFA Co-Head of Credit and Head of Credit Research Mitch joined Hermes in February 2010 as head of research on the Hermes Credit team. Prior to this he was co-head of credit research for the global credit and hybrids team at Fortis Investments. Other roles at Fortis included portfolio manager of European high yield funds, based in London, and senior credit analyst, based in Paris. Before this he worked as an associate analyst in the leveraged finance group at Moody’s Investors Service in New York. Mitch earned a master’s degree in International Affairs at Columbia University in New York City and a Bachelor’s degree in History at Pitzer College, one of the Claremont Colleges in California. He is a CFA charterholder; a member of the Capital Markets Advisory Committee of the IFRS Foundation, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe High Yield Investor Committee, and the Credit Advisory Committee for the PRI; and a workstream member of the UK-China Green Finance Task Force.
Read all articles by Mitch Reznick, CFA

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Andrey Kuznetsov, CFA
  • Audra Stundziaite
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Elena Tedesco
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Gary Greenberg
  • Geir Lode
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Hamish Galpin
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Mitch Reznick, CFA
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Patrick Marshall
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tim Goodman
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • credit