Search this website. You can use fund codes to locate specific funds

This voting season saw a notable increase in shareholder resolutions seeking a vote on climate transition plans, and proposals for racial equity audits.

This year we saw a number of companies offering shareholders a vote on their climate transition plans, including some in the oil and gas, construction, aviation, and consumer goods sectors. This came in response to various moves to improve investor scrutiny of such plans, following the rapid expansion in the number of companies aiming to achieve net-zero emissions.

EOS at Federated Hermes is generally supportive of the concept of a vote on transition plans, believing it will improve a company’s focus on climate change and aid transparency. It should also improve investor scrutiny and engagement, and provide a clear pathway to engagement escalation in the event of material opposition from shareholders. We sought to support proposals that demonstrated robust target-setting, were aligned to external frameworks and accreditations such as the Science-Based Targets initiative, and where we could see a clear and credible strategy in place to achieve the stated targets, including at Unilever, Aviva and Nestlé.

This year we also saw a significant number of racial equity audit shareholder proposals, including at US banks Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase. Resolutions requesting enhanced disclosure on the effectiveness of diversity and inclusion programmes were also filed at American Express, Berkshire Hathaway, Johnson & Johnson and others. Although we did not always agree with every aspect of the supporting statements, we broadly agreed with their substance, believing that racial equity audits would add substantial value beyond the actions the companies were already taking.

During engagement we explained that audits can provide additional insight into the root causes of complex problems that companies must address in order to develop enduring solutions. They also enable more rigorous performance evaluation against underlying challenges and increase a board’s capacity to provide effective oversight.

This article appears in our Q2 2021 Public Engagement Report.

Related Insights

Public declaration of voting recommendations 2022
We record the public declarations that have been made so far in 2022. We plan to update this as and when we make further public declarations.
EOS Stewardship Report 2021
As EOS publishes its second UK Stewardship Report as a service provider we highlight some of the key takeaways and enhancements.
LyondellBasell case study
EOS engaged with LyondellBasell to set more ambitious climate targets.
Petrobras case study
We engaged with Petrobras in the development of its governance framework of subsidiaries.
Creating value by addressing social injustice
Social injustice occurs when people do not have access to the same rights and opportunities afforded to others, due to race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, religion, disabilities or other characteristics.
The digital dilemma
The second article in our Q1 Public Engagement Report examines how we are engaging with social media and technology companies on digital rights.

EOS Client Service and Business Development

Amy D’Eugenio,
Head of Client Service and Business Development, EOS